Final collapse

April 25th 2020

Excerpt from Homo Simulator. The end of the Neolithic world live and direct, before our eyes, still incredulous that we are living in prophesied times that do not conform to what our grandiloquent millenarian epic imagined. An end, in any case, that is the beginning of something more frightening or of a paradise of free humans. That is what we are deciding without daring to know it.

Chang An Avenue in Beijing in 1979 was crowded with bicycles ridden by men and women dressed almost in uniform, who negotiated the few buses that got in their way without much difficulty. China’s capital then had 5,600,000 bicycles and 77,000 automobiles. China’s poverty rate was over 90% and CO2 emissions were over 1.5 metric tons per capita. Just thirty-nine years later, in 2018, that same avenue is collapsed by road traffic and its pedestrians dress in a way that is perfectly comparable to those of any other city in the developed world. The number of cars has increased more than 100-fold to 8,540,000, while the number of bicycles has dropped to 2,000,000. The poverty rate in the country as a whole does not exceed 5% and CO2 emissions exceed 7 metric tons per capita.

If we apply the criteria of conservationist environmentalism, Beijing, and with it all the cities of the world, including those of the developed Western countries, should resemble the image of 1979, with CO2 emission values close to those of China 39 years ago. Of course, in order to comply with the dogma of sustainable economy, clothing consumption should also be limited to an image of sobriety and uniformity close to that of the poorly sustainable Beijing.

But what is sustainable economy?

For the ecological ideology, because that is what it has become, it consists of adjusting consumption to levels that do not endanger the environment. Although we do not know if to achieve this diffuse objective it would be enough with the environmental quality of the Chinese poverty of 40 years ago or it would be necessary to adjust more until reaching, for example, the level of the first Neolithic or, even, that of 15,000 years ago. What we do know is what, in practice, is the model of sustainable economy that is being presented to us:

Poverty managed by communism. Minimum consumption and maximum dirigisme.

The conservationist environmentalism has been possessed by a collectivist ideology that drinks directly from communism. And we must not forget that European neo-feudalism consists of 50% communism and 50% free trade under the tutelage of a cyclopean regulation. Why has the environmental movement been hijacked? Well, because communism, like any ideology, tries to survive by mutating into the accessory in order not to be recognized by the antibodies of the ancestral European model and to be able to spread to the maximum number of people. And this ecological suit is perfect to deceive the Europeans.

Paranoia?

Where do the big problems for conservation environmentalism lie? In consumption and individual freedom. We consume too much and, in order to adjust consumption to sustainable limits, we must adopt new habits that imply a loss of individual freedom. Collective transport, herbivorous food, biodegradable products… Of course, no airplanes. And, another thing, food products of proximity and season, because it is not really necessary to leave the region to be ecologically happy. The wet dream of the feudal Middle Ages. But, curiously, nothing is said about human overpopulation. On the contrary, the prophetic message of conservationist ecologism, which only has real predilection in Europe and, somewhat less, in the Europeanized countries of Christian origin, is complemented with new versions of “grow and multiply”, and welcome the excess of birth rate to which they are entitled in the third world, pointing out the low birth rate as the great danger for developed nations, for pensions in need of new workers and for economic development in need of more consumers.

It is overpopulation that makes consumption unsustainable.

All the emphasis is placed on consumption to hide the population bubble. And that shows us who has appropriated the environmentalist approaches and for what purpose: Who is interested in not reducing the population even if it means reducing consumption and living standards? It is clear: the collectivist ideologies and the great shepherds. And so, of the two formulas for ensuring that the environment does not degrade to unbearable limits, population restriction or consumption restriction, the ancestral Europeans will always choose the former and the neolithic shepherds, together with all their herd of Homo ceres, the latter.

Reduce population, not consumption and the quality of life of the population.

To live with a high standard of living (Bern 2019), adjusting the population to bearable densities, or with a low standard of living (Beijing 1979) without reducing the population but increasing it. That is the question.

The reduction of consumption and living standards transforms Humanity into placid herds of herbivores guided by the shepherds of minimum environmental impact. But, if we were to take overpopulation as the main problem, we could implement a global society of minimum impact in which the predator/prey ratio would be kept within sustainable limits without the need to reduce the standard of living of humans.

Conservation environmentalism, aligned with collectivist movements, does not seek to leave the neolithic system or to make the quality of life of humans compatible with the sustainability of the environment. It does not speak of reducing the population but of collectivizing and directing it. It identifies consumption with consumerism in order to emphasize something that hides the real and only problem, overpopulation. Because, if overpopulation does not decrease, there are simply no resources for all of us to live like in the First World. Therefore, we will all live as in the Third World, previously convinced that such poverty is necessary. Always the need leading the flock.

It is a lie. Consumption does not equal consumerism.

The aim is not human happiness but that of the “planet”, which in reality is nothing more than a synonym for “sustainable global farm” which, in turn, is a euphemism for “maximum profitability”: maximum number of animals with minimum costs.

If human happiness and the end of the conversion into Homo ceres were sought, it would be enough to reduce the population to a limit bearable by the global ecosystem. If we were to eliminate overpopulation, the environmental impact would be minimized in relation to a maximum standard of living and freedom for the greatest possible number of humans. That should be the criterion: the predator/prey or human/ecosystem ratio. An ecosystem intervened not to provide the maximum human population no matter in what living conditions but, on the contrary, to provide the best living conditions for the maximum number of people. An interventionist, creationist ecologism, builder of Eden, of optimized ecosystems. To transform the Sahara into an orchard and not simply let Nature build and maintain deserts.

It is not the environmental disaster that is the protagonist of the end of the world, as those infected by collectivist and dirigiste ideologies would have us believe. It is not the planet or humanity that is at stake, but the global farm sustained by the population bubble. The end will not be an ecological question because, before that, the human question will explode in the form of generalized and violent conflicts that will destroy civilization, not the world or humanity. This is what the collectivist ideologies and the great shepherds are trying to avoid: the end of the population bubble and the loss of their livestock business.

They defend the business, their farm, not the planet and certainly not the people.

The disaster will be unleashed before we reach the absolute limit of the planetary ecosystem and will occur not because we have caused a massive extinction of life on Earth, nor because we have deteriorated the conditions for life to the point of requiring a period of hundreds or thousands of years for its recovery. The equivalent of a great climatic crisis that will stop the Neolithic engine will occur in a scenario with a vast majority of Homo ceres with a very low standard of living and quality of life and, therefore, consuming very few resources, while a minority of Homo predator enjoys an extraordinary quality of life. It will be a population limit point not for the planet but for the neolithic technosystem itself, incapable of overcoming its contradictions. A collapse of the technosystem precipitated and aggravated by a real climatic crisis of global cooling or by a simple incident amplified by overpopulation, the enormous technological development and globalization. A simple pandemic, a volcanic eruption, just a year or two of bad harvests… A stupid war.

The Mark of the Beast

June 6th 2021

…and that no man may buy or sell, save he that hath the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name (Revelation 13:17).

Magnetizable proteins, magnetic nanoparticles, subepidermal tattoos or any other formula with which to implant an organically compatible marker with which to emit and receive information. The denialist and conspiranoic explanation for the inexplicable is based on this assumption: the universal and fanatical determination to vaccinate the entire world population with substances that do not prevent the contagion of a disease that has caused, in a year and a half, fewer deaths than the Asian flu of 1957 or more or less the same, if we believe the PCR data, than the Hong Kong flu of 1968.

Absurd, isn’t it?

But what is the apocalypse if not pure conspiracy? What is the announcement of the end times with its final judgment and its chosen few among the many called who will survive the final holocaust that will bring with it, like any war, Armageddon between the forces of evil and good? Was not Churchill conspiratorial for his political adversaries, candid followers of the do-gooder Neville Chamberlain? Were not those who believed that the Earth was flat and that the Universe revolved around it or, more recently, those who thought that by closing cities and houses or covering their faces they could defeat the Black Death, affirmationists? Finally, was not the opinion of a certain Robert Koch a denialist of the universally accepted medical doctrine? Was it not the opinion of all medical science prior to 2019 that rejected mass confinement of the population or the need to meet the deadlines for testing new drugs and vaccines as a means of combating epidemics, no matter how serious the disease?

Why is it not allowed to use experimental drugs in patients dying of very serious diseases such as cancer, and yet the massive use of experimental vaccines for a disease with a mortality rate of 0.026% is authorized in the entire population?

What is happening is so insane that we can only explain it rationally by appealing to the negationist, critical, skeptical… conspiranoic rationality that has presided over all the great advances of Humanity since the path of medieval superstition was abandoned, that of confinements, ghettos, persecution of heretics, lynchings, autos de fe, the Inquisition, watcher of the truth… Because that minority, select, clairvoyant attitude is the one that has saved Humanity from the terror of Mother Nature, maximum expression of cruelty, inhumanity and globalism, which the thirties of the last century reproduced with horrifying effectiveness: Nazism, communism, persecutions, holocausts, gulags, ghettos, ariernachweis… stars of David.

It is impossible to understand the scientific nonsense of vaccines without considering them as a simple instrument to achieve an objective of social engineering of proportions equivalent to the unprecedented unanimity of the different powers of different political or professional sign when it comes to impose by absolutely dictatorial means whatever is in these so-called “vaccines”.

A marker to detect who has really been vaccinated. A kind of QR code to detect fake green passports (never before has that color been a symbol of submission, poverty and terror as it is now). An infallible method to locate and, eventually, punish the denialists who acquire and issue false laissez-passers with which to enjoy the fundamental rights of man, those that the UN extols in its digital pulpits and pursues in the streets. A certificate of blood purity to separate (that is apartheid) from society the false converts to the affirmationist faith of the New Normality, that which already, on the back of social inertia, of the little by little does not hurt, of the goebbelsian and very effective trick of “a lie repeated a thousand times becomes the truth”, has been implanted without the slightest opposition. As in Nazi Germany, in the Soviet Union or in North Korea. Exactly the same.

An emitting mechanism through which a wide range of information about people can be captured, from their location to their emotional state, their vital signs, their genetic characteristics… their conversations or, why not, their opinions.

A subcutaneous electrode that will serve as the electrode that Dr. Rodriguez Delgado implanted in the brain of a raging bull back in the sixties and with which he was able to stop the beast at the push of a button. A Stimociver incorporated with the vaccines and by means of which the state of health, mood or even cognitive state of people can be changed. A perfect global control mechanism hidden under the skin and, most importantly, under tons of social engineering applied through mass media, social networks… and political, social and labor blackmail.

I thought that the vaccines obeyed a political objective of the white Western ruling classes who had fallen, and only they, into the trap of the falsely serious pandemic spread by China with the indispensable collaboration of the WHO and the mass media. A placebo vaccines to stop the ruin and dictatorship to which it had subjected its citizens, now subjects and serfs, without having to recognize its mistake: “The pandemic was really serious enough to justify the measures we took, but now everything will return to (new) normality with the vaccines” (https://ozyesite.com/2020/09/09/hipotesis-b/). I thought it was just a political trick for our inept (now I see, also miserable) leaders to get impunity and, as a gift, more power. But I have to admit that every day that passes sustaining this infamous, medieval and, now already, Dantesque farce, I find myself in the rational obligation to accept the possibility of an absolutely conspiratorial, critical, heterodox… scientific hypothesis: Vaccines are the mark of the Beast. And the beast that has brought all the powers of this world into agreement almost without exception cannot be of this world. At least, not of the world as we know it. Nor, necessarily, of a supernatural world.

Perhaps it is from a parallel world in which the Beast is in the form of a dragon and of which our mighty ones are nothing more than simple farm managers on the farm where they are marking their human cattle for something.

To kill your cattle? No farmer does that. Then, it can only be for the opposite: to multiply it and lock it up in intensive farms, overcrowded, isolated, immobilized, deprived of everything except feed, water, dedicated only to produce with the minimum cost whatever they get from us.

Or, perhaps, yes, perhaps it is the instrument of doomsday. Maybe it is what it seems to be: a brutal, systematic, efficient and clean holocaust. Identical in its basic principles to that of the trains and the extermination camps. That is why there are nations in which vaccination is scarcely carried out and others in which the pressure to vaccinate people reaches totalitarian limits unthinkable just a few months ago.

Heads or tails: global farm living in third-world facilities like chickens and cows or extermination camp. That is the only unknown. Everything else is of a frightening certainty, seen through rational, scientific… conspiranoic eyes.

La marca de la Bestia

6 Junio 2021

...y que ninguno pueda comprar o vender, sino el que tenga la marca, o el nombre de la bestia, o el número de su nombre (Apocalipsis 13:17)

Proteínas magnetizables, nanopartículas magnéticas, tatuajes subepidérmicos o cualquier otra fórmula con la que implantar un marcador orgánicamente compatible con el que emitir y recibir información. En tal supuesto se basa la negacionista y conspiranóica explicación a lo inexplicable: el universal y fanático empeño en vacunar a toda la población mundial con unas substancias que no evitan el contagio de una enfermedad que ha causado, en año y medio, menos muertes que la gripe asiática de 1957 o más o menos las mismas, si nos creemos los datos de las PCR, que la gripe de Hong Kong de 1968.

Absurdo, ¿verdad?

¿Pero qué es el apocalipsis sino pura conspiranóia? ¿Qué el anuncio del fin de los tiempos con su juicio final y sus pocos elegidos entre los muchos llamados que sobrevivirán al holocausto final que llevará consigo, como toda guerra, el Armagedón entre las fuerzas del mal y del bien? ¿Acaso no era conspiranóico Churchill para sus adversarios políticos, cándidos seguidores del buenista Neville Chamberlain? ¿No eran afirmacionistas los que creían que la Tierra era plana y que el Universo giraba a su alrededor o, más recientemente, los que pensaban que cerrando las ciudades y las casas o tapándose la cara podían vencer a la Peste Negra? ¿No era, en fin, negacionista de las doctrina médica universalmente aceptada la opinión de un tal Robert Koch? ¿Acaso no lo era la de toda la ciencia médica anterior a 2019 que desechaba como medio de lucha contra epidémica el confinamiento masivo de la población o la necesidad de cumplir los plazos de comprobación de nuevos medicamentos y vacunas por muy grave que fuera la enfermedad?

¿Por qué no se permite usar medicamentos experimentales en enfermos desahuciados por gravísimas enfermedades como el cáncer y, sin embargo, se autoriza el uso masivo en toda la población de unas vacunas experimentales para una enfermedad con una mortalidad del 0,026%?

Es algo tan demencial lo que está ocurriendo que sólo podemos explicarlo racionalmente apelando a la racionalidad negacionista, crítica, escéptica… conspiranóica que ha presidido todos los grandes avances de la Humanidad desde que se abandonó la senda de la superstición medieval, esa de los confinamientos, los guetos la persecución de los herejes, los linchamientos, los autos de fe, la Inquisición veladora de la verdad… Porque esa actitud minoritaria, selecta, clarividente es la que ha salvado a la Humanidad del terror de la Madre Naturaleza, máxima expresión de la crueldad, la inhumanidad y el globalismo, que los años treinta del siglo pasado reprodujeron con espeluznante eficacia: nazismo, comunismo, persecuciones, holocaustos, gulags, guetos, ariernachweis… estrellas de David.

Es imposible entender el sinsentido científico de las vacunas sin contemplarlas como un simple instrumento para lograr un objetivo de ingeniería social de proporciones equivalentes a la inaudita unanimidad de los diferentes poderes de distinto signo político o profesional a la hora de imponer por medios absolutamente dictatoriales lo que quiera que hay en esas llamadas “vacunas”.

Un marcador para detectar quién verdaderamente se ha vacunado. Una especie de código QR para detectar los falsos pasaportes verdes (nunca antes ese color fue símbolo de sumisión, pobreza y terror como ahora). Un método infalible para localizar y, eventualmente, castigar a los negacionistas que adquieren y emiten falsos salvoconductos con los que poder disfrutar de los derechos fundamentales del hombre, esos que la ONU ensalza en sus púlpitos digitales y persigue en las calles. Un certificado de pureza sanguínea para separar (eso es el apartheid) de la sociedad a los falsos conversos a la fe afirmacionista de la Nueva Normalidad, esa que ya, a lomos de la inercia social, del poco a poco no duele, del goebbelsiano y eficacísimo truco de “una mentira repetida mil veces se convierte en verdad”, se ha implantado sin que se produzca la más mínima oposición. Como en la Alemania Nazi, en la Unión Soviética o en Corea del Norte. Exactamente igual.

Un mecanismo emisor mediante el que se puede captar un amplio rango de información de las personas, desde su localización hasta su estado emocional, sus constantes vitales, sus características genéticas… sus conversaciones o. por qué no, sus opiniones.

Un electrodo subcutáneo que hagas las veces del electrodo que el Doctor Rodriguez Delgado implantó en el encéfalo de un toro bravo allá por los años sesenta y con el que fue capaz de detener a la bestia con sñolo apretar un botón. Un Stimociver incorporado con las vacunas y mediante el que se pueda cambiar el estado de salud, anímico o, incluso cognitivo de las personas. Un perfecto mecanismo de control global oculto bajo la piel y, lo más importante, bajo toneladas de ingeniería social aplicada mediante los medios de comunicación de masas, las redes sociales… y el chantaje político, social y laboral.

Pensaba que las vacunas obedecían a un objetivo político de las clases dirigentes occidentales blancas que habían caído, y sólo ellas, en la trampa de la falsamente grave pandemia extendida por China con la imprescindible colaboración de la OMS y de los grandes medios de comunicación. Unas vacunas placebo para detener la ruina y la dictadura a la que había sometido a sus ciudadanos, ahora súbditos y siervos, sin tener que reconocer su error: “La pandemia era realmente lo suficientemente grave como para justificar las medidas que tomamos, pero ahora todo volverá a la (nueva) normalidad con las vacunas” (https://ozyesite.com/2020/09/09/hipotesis-b/). Yo creía que era un simple truco político para que nuestros ineptos (ahora veo que, también miserables) líderes obtuvieran impunidad y, de regalo, más poder. Pero tengo que reconocer que cada día que pasan sosteniendo esta infame, medieval y, ahora ya, dantesca farsa, me veo en la racional obligación de aceptar la posibilidad de una hipótesis absolutamente conspiranóica, crítica, heterodoxa… científica: Las vacunas son la marca de la Bestia. Y la bestia que ha puesto de acuerdo a todos los poderes de este mundo casi sin excepción no puede ser de este mundo. Al menos, no del mundo tal y como lo conocemos. Tampoco, necesariamente, de un mundo sobrenatural.

Tal vez sí de un mundo paralelo en el que la Bestia tiene forma de dragón y del que nuestros poderosos no son más que simples encargados de la granja en la que están marcando a sus reses humanas para algo.

¿Para matar a su ganado? Eso no lo hace ningún granjero. Luego, sólo puede ser para todo lo contrario: para multiplicarlo y encerrarlo en granjas intensivas, hacinados, aislados, inmovilizados, privados de todo excepto de pienso, agua, dedicados sólo a producir con el mínimo coste lo que sea que obtienen de nosotros.

O, tal vez, sí, Tal vez sea el instrumento del juicio final. Quizá sea lo que parece: Un brutal sistemático, eficaz y limpio holocausto. Idéntico en sus principios básicos al de los trenes y los campos de exterminio. Por eso hay naciones en las que apenas se vacunan y, otras, en el que la presión para vacunar a la gente alcanza límites totalitarios impensables hace pocos meses.

Cara o cruz: granja global viviendo en instalaciones tercermundistas como las gallinas y las vacas o campo de exterminio. Esa es la única incógnita. Todo lo demás es de una certeza espeluznante, visto con ojos racionales, científicos… conspiranóicos.

Witiza Mistake

December 11th 2020

Excerpt from“Homo Simulator” https://www.amazon.es/Homo-Simulator-Rafael-Ortiz-Garcia-ebook/dp/B086Z38P2Z

If loyalty is denaturalized, the miraculous equilibrium with dissidence crumbles and a disloyal dissidence is born, which turns into fratricidal struggle. An example of this alliance with the exterior to achieve the triumph over the interior adversary turned into an enemy when the binomial of the ancestral European is broken and loyalty disappears can be found in the Mohammedan invasion of the Visigothic kingdom of Hispania: The “Witiza Error”.

The kings of Visigothic Hispania were elected by the nobles, which caused intrigues and bloody struggles for power that were called “morbus gothorum” (the disease of the Goths). This disease occurs when society does not act as a single group but as a field of confrontation between different factions seeking power.

The conquest of Gothic Hispania by the Mohammedans was presided over by one of these confrontations. The followers of King Witiza, who had been succeeded by King Roderic, decided to support the Mohammedans, who invaded the peninsula from the Maghreb, thinking that they could use them to seize power and then get rid of them. And with this objective in mind, the followers of Witiza, who led the wings of the Visigoth army in the battle of Guadalete, went over to the enemy at the crucial moment leading to the defeat of Roderic’s army.

Of course, the Mohammedan invaders had no intention of enjoying the spoils and returning to their lands, but occupied the entire Iberian Peninsula and, after a few years of condescension with their Witizian allies, ended up taking absolute power.

The Witiza Error consists of relying on external forces to win an internal battle.

The Muslim invasion of Hispania took place in a context characterized by the defenselessness of the Visigothic society, confident in the initial tolerance shown by the Mohammedans. But it would never have been possible without the “morbus gothorum” that led to the political division and the betrayal of the “fidelis regis” of Witiza, persuaded that the Muslims would serve them to take power but would not be a danger to their power.

From all points of view, the Visigothic kingdom was powerful enough to have prevented the invasion. But it had a social weakness that led it not to defend itself and to allow the triumph of the Muslims. The Witiza error, the weakness based on indiscriminate solidarity and a mythological deception: World War III.

World War II was initiated by National Socialism (Nazi Germany) and International Socialism (Soviet Russia). After defeating one of the contenders by means of a conjunctural alliance with Russia, exactly like the one between Russia and Germany, the Cold War was nothing more than the continuation of that unfinished World War II. The social democracy and neo-feudalism established in Europe to defend itself against the advance of the communist ideological troops had a very costly success insofar as it established a profound weakness that is now being exploited in the third phase of World War II.

To call World War III this last phase of the conflict unleashed in 1939 with the invasion of Poland by Germany and Russia generates a deceptive perspective that is part of the strategy of the collectivist bloc. Because the best way to defeat a superior enemy is to make it remain defenseless waiting for a conventional conflict that will never come, while it is invaded in an atypical way from outside and from within.

The defenders of the free world are completely deceived by the enemy trying to find the closest thing to a conventional battlefield in a conflict that has been defined as radical and profoundly different from all others. They are tilting at windmills, persuaded that they are the mythological giants against whom the future of humanity is being decided. And they are not giants but dwarfs who distract the attention of the allied quixotes so that their former collectivist enemies can defeat them without firing a single shot.

No. Terrorism is not the characteristic form of confrontation in World War III. Because that war as such does not exist. The proof is that its effects, from the war point of view, are ridiculous, in spite of the disproportionate echo they achieve in weak Europeanized societies. Terrorism in itself will never succeed in invading and dominating a Europeanized society, because it is not a strategy of military success but, on the contrary, a demonstration of military impotence used as a distraction by the powerful propaganda of the collectivist world. Terrorism is a thermometer of how weak the society it attacks is and of its propensity not to defend itself.

The limited use of force in the Vietnam War, which led to the defeat of the most powerful nation on Earth, was a direct consequence of American social weakness. Internal political affairs, a morbus gothorum light, were strongly conditioned by public opinion (in the Visigothic kingdom elected by the nobles), easily manipulated in the age of globalization and information thanks to the control of the media, prevented the use of all the force of which the USA was capable and with which it would have obtained victory without any doubt. The result was that, thanks to the pressure of the conglomerate of indiscriminate solidarity and the division of American society, the Vietnamese lost their freedom and prosperity.

The Witiza Error was decisive for a more powerful army to be defeated by a weaker one. But in the case that we are going to describe below, the two armies did not even face each other.

General Franco was dying. The only non-communist European dictatorship since the end of World War II was coming to an end and the unknowns were as overwhelming as when a Visigothic king died and the supporters of the different factions prepared to fight for power. Spain’s social weakness was extreme. So extreme that it was taken advantage of by its Maghrebi Mohammedan neighbors (again Visigothic Hispania) to occupy Western Sahara without firing a shot.

On April 29, 1975, the Saigon government fell and the defeat of the most powerful army on Earth was consummated. Barely six months later, on November 5 of the same year, King Hassan II of Morocco announced that, the following day, they would occupy Western Sahara. It was a decisive year in the History of Humanity, but not because the most powerful nation on Earth had allowed itself to be defeated by an inferior army, but because an unprecedented tactic was going to be tested with devastating success.

The situation in the USA and, especially, in Spain in those years was very much reminiscent of what happened to the Visigothic kingdom in July 711. When the Muslims entered Hispania, the Visigoths were, as usual, locked in an internal power struggle that kept Roderic and his army quelling a rebellion in the north. During the communist onslaught in Vietnam, the USA was divided by the same tension that had been generated in Europe by the social democratic antidote and that on both sides of the Atlantic led to a Witiza Error that unnecessarily prolonged the Cold War. But in Spain things looked much worse, given that it was in a situation of maximum political weakness due to the death of the dictator and the decisive support of the USA and France for the Kingdom of Morocco.

King Hassan II did not announce that his army would occupy Spanish territory, but that unarmed civilians would do so by means of a peaceful march. The Green March. And that was the substantial difference with the American case in Vietnam and with the invasion of the Visigothic kingdom. In the Sahara there was no military confrontation but rather the Spanish social weakness was exploited to the maximum by simulating a migratory wave. And Spain simply refused to defend itself against a group of unarmed civilians. Why? Well, because international public opinion, the allies and the European and Europeanized countries would not tolerate the use of force of arms to stop the force of non-arms.

The migratory waves across the Mediterranean, from Libya or Morocco, the small boats, the great march of refugees from the Near East through Turkey encouraged from within the EU by a faction of “Christian-social Goths” or the caravans of Central American migrants towards the US border through Mexico (there is always a through) are replicas of the Green March now suffered by those who in their day did not condemn it, the European and Europeanized countries led by the US and France. Replicas of the “Green March” such as that of “Refugees Wellcome”, which placed the EU before an unprecedented political crisis and nine months later the British decided to abandon it in a referendum, while the anti-indiscriminate immigration parties, called populist, identitarian or Europhobic by the pro-immigrationists, reached levels of support unthinkable only five years earlier.

The new neolithic invasion is carried out through the Green March principle, exploiting to the maximum the social weakness that, encouraged from within by the Witiza Error, prevents the use of all available power to defend the remnants of the dissidence-loyalty model that survive in the neofeudal Europe invaded by waves of “unarmed civilian volunteers”.

The Green March was the rehearsal of the strategy that dominates the current confrontation, but it was not the beginning of that confrontation that only in the free world is called World War III. It served to evaluate the level of weakness that societies based on the dissidence-loyalty model can reach when it is denaturalized by means of simple information manipulation, propaganda and the concealment of data typical of a neo-feudal structure.

If in Poland the blitzkrieg, “lightning war”, was successfully tested, in the Spanish Sahara the weichkrieg, “soft war”, was tried with no less success. The latter is much more difficult to perceive as a real war because it is an unarmed confrontation, based on inducing the defenselessness of the enemy, sustained by the Witiza Error of the social democrats, considering that the Mohammedans of today, like those of the 8th century, can be safely used to obtain power in the scenario of a contemporary morbus gothorum.

The Visigothic Kingdom, Germanic and profoundly European, overthrew itself. Now it is not a kingdom that is at stake, but the denouement of the end of the Neolithic world. Armageddon. A real war, whose consequences will last much longer than the eight centuries of Mohammedan domination of the Iberian Peninsula. A war that began in 1939 and has not yet ended. It is the new and last war of the 100 years in its final phase which many call, to confuse the enemy who would defeat them if they were clear about the terms of the conflict, World War III.

Ciberlytic

May 1st 2021

Life is carbon-based, but the main policy objective of the New Normal is decarbonization.

The collective unconscious is a little-studied phenomenon because it holds important keys to understanding the ease with which almost any idea or norm (normality) can be established through social engineering without the slightest opposition. And this collective unconscious, which is expressed not only in ideologies and explicit slogans but also in cinema, literature, serials…, tells us about something that everyone knows, consciously or unconsciously, and everyone is silent about. We are about to enter a new era of Humanity that will replace the Neolithic: the Cyberlithic. And the Cyberlithic consists, ultimately, in decarbonizing human life, in substituting little by little the organic support of our consciousness, based on carbon, for another type of support based on different chemical elements.

Yes, transhumanism.

Is this good or bad? Neither one or the other. It is inevitable.

Grow and multiply.

For a society based on extensive livestock farming on immense and poor land, with backward technology and an extraordinarily low population density, the problem is not the impact on the environment or on the quality of human life, but to win the battle against the powerful and cruel Nature that surrounds them.

The more livestock, the more people they can feed. And the more people a human group has, the greater its power to obtain territories and resources with which to feed more livestock. That is the Neolithic engine, the force that still controls our lives, our ideas and our beliefs.

Everything, from religion to morality, including the position of women and non-reproductive individuals, politics, technology or the economy, is conditioned by this neolithic livestock principle that generates, as the final product without which the system collapses, a population bubble.

As soon as environmental conditions allow it, this drive for livestock and human growth, which extends to the rest of the economic activity (economic progress is synonymous with “growth”, not, for example, with quality or happiness), leads to a population bubble that shoots up as its natural predators, mainly climatic, disappear.

Cold and heat. Dryness and humidity. Scarcity and abundance. These are the terms that determine the reality of humans.

When we lived according to our anatomical, physiological, psychological and social design built up over hundreds of thousands of years, as group predatory omnivores, human population control was guaranteed by natural mechanisms. Population density depended directly on the abundance of food resources, especially animal prey. It was impossible for a population bubble to be created because the predator/prey ratio did not allow it. Human hunters, with Paleolithic technology, could never become a threat to any open ecosystem or to their own “way of being”, that is, to their possibilities of being happy, something that is an inherent part of human nature.

With the end of the last glaciation, humans changed their paradigm and, while retaining their design as group hunters, they became pastoralists, first of other species and, quickly, also of other humans, starting with women. The Neolithic is not fundamentally an economic, social and cultural system based on agriculture, but on animal husbandry. Agriculture is part of the technology necessary to sustain an intensive livestock model, as is the construction of intensive farms (the cities) and the complex systems of control of the human herd (ideologies, beliefs, hierarchical political systems…) All of this is described in detail at https://www.amazon.es/Homo-Simulator-Rafael-Ortiz-Garcia-ebook/dp/B086Z38P2Z.

As technology developed, driven by the need for larger (human) livestock herds, artificial ecosystems, the technosystems, were created to mimic conditions favorable for life and, therefore, for the growth of the population bubble. What are these conditions that our technosystems mimic? Heat, humidity and high levels of CO2.

It was never a bad year for a lot of wheat.

The abundance of resources leads to an increase in biodiversity and in the total “quantity” of plant and animal life. And this abundance of resources goes hand in hand, unfailingly, with heat, humidity and CO2, which is the main food of plants, the beginning of the chain of life based on the carbon atom of the CO2 molecule. This is so obvious that only the extraordinary capacity of the Neolithic livestock system to shape society’s beliefs can explain why public opinion defends the contrary.

A cold climate leads to lower humidity, i.e., greater dryness and lower CO2 levels, which implies less vegetation development, which in turn allows for fewer animals. Life, as a whole, decreases when environmental conditions are cold, dry and low in CO2. And that’s not good for any living organism. Nor is it good for humans.

But, if warm seasons are undoubtedly more favorable for life and, therefore, for humans, why are they trying to impose the opposite idea? What devilish purpose is behind this effort to limit the main food of plants and fight against global warming?

A shepherd who wants to reduce his flock?

Is there anyone who lives on livestock and wants to reduce their herd so that their animals are happier living freely in an open space with enough resources to feed themselves and no predators to threaten them? Really? Is that what we say those same elites we accuse of living off our backs, exploiting us; those that the more of us there are, the better they live?

No, man, no. The real elites don’t want to go out of business. And their business is us, the human cattle.

And yet, the flock advocates that there should be more and more of us. “Do not allow the diabolical elites to reduce the population. Let us defend life. The shepherds are delighted. But is it really in the Norwegians’ interest that their country triples its population, preferably with multicultural people from the Third World? For what, to touch less (don’t be selfish)? Well, that’s the automated response by the ideological viruses with which they handle a majority of humans. To touch less so that farmers can earn more thanks to the fact that they can fit more cattle in the same farm consuming the same amount of food and energy… Translated, of course, in terms of moral illusionism: solidarity, equality, humanity… Remember: Don’t be selfish. Share. Cost the children that others have happily decided to have just because or because their principles dictate it.

But reality, in the end, rules. And we are already at the end.

The conscious and unconscious signs that we are approaching a change of cycle determined by the end of the benign climatic conditions of the interglacial period and by technological and scientific development, are obscured by the inertia of the neolithic livestock system, which aims to keep the bubble alive, trying at all costs not to decrease the population.

Why do they say, then, that it is necessary to avoid warming and CO2 if that would allow to have a greater number of human livestock? What is the purpose of this huge and grotesque lie? Quite simply, to increase the profitability of the business and guarantee its survival for as long as possible. It is not about saving the planet, it is that we accept to live in greater poverty, without moving much so as not to waste energy unproductively, crammed in domestic cages, isolated from each other so that our nature of group predators does not awaken and we rebel, raising the population to the maximum with the minimum of resources and without making the farm very dirty.

For farmers, it’s quantity. For real humans, it’s quality. Which do you choose?

Economic welfare is so closely linked to growth that population control or, even worse, population reduction is considered an economic catastrophe. But population increase, brutal in the poorest areas of the planet, can only be sustained by scientific and technological development capable of sustaining a constantly growing livestock herd by intensifying facilities, which implies a series of consequences for the vast majority of the population, the herd, that do not affect the minority, the shepherds or farmers.

Overcrowding, immobility, isolation and poverty to reduce the need for food, material goods and freedom requirements incompatible with livestock intensification. It is necessary to reduce the standard of living of the herds which enjoy better material conditions and freedom of movement, the first world, to share among all (equality, solidarity, social justice) and that there is enough. Sustainability, food health, sanitary protection… all these are just euphemisms to hide the principles of profitability and intensification of human livestock facilities. Everything, except attacking the problem of the population bubble that, whether we want it or not, is going to burst in a very short time. In fact, it has already begun to do so, in unison with the desperate efforts of farmers to implement global intensive livestock farming conditions, concretized in the viral dictatorship, climate change and equality disguised as “normalization of differences” to hide the imposition of uniformity of the only aspect that interests a farmer: the submission of the herd.

The development of automation, artificial intelligence and robotization will make the excess of human population completely unnecessary both in economic terms of production/consumption and in terms of security and competition between groups. It will not be necessary to bring into the world or mold human beings equivalent to domesticated herbivores so that real humans can live in the best conditions to do what is proper to them: to seek happiness freely, without material or labor ties, with all their time for themselves, as the dominant minorities do now, who cynically defend the need to continue increasing the population at the cost of reducing their standard of living to maintain or increase theirs.

But maintaining population growth, instead of reducing it in a non-traumatic way, will only cause much more suffering until the bubble bursts and, then, that reduction will take place in a cruel and massive way. And, in the meantime, what is being sought: a growing mass of unemployed people living in conditions of sustainable poverty with social incomes equivalent, at best, to the lower classes of the First World? Importing a Third World population bubble to sustain the pyramidal scam of First World pensions and that, finally, the First World becomes the Third World?

What is the reason for not already initiating a program to stop and reduce the population?

Irrational reasons based on religious beliefs of nomadic shepherds who lived more than three thousand years ago in the desert Middle East, tautological arguments created by the same pyramidal dynamics on which the neolithic livestock economy is based, addicted to growth to sustain the farmers’ addiction to quality or, simply, herd reasons, automatic, absurd to the point of nausea, such as, for example, that humans only occupy a tiny percentage of the available space on Earth.

What is the reason for bringing into the world as many people as possible? To defend life? The livestock discourse has identified population growth without control of any kind, neither natural nor artificial, with the defense of life. Whose life? The life of those who have not even been conceived? The life of the non-living at the expense of the living?

What will we do with those millions of human carbon machines that we have accumulated to avoid the “demographic catastrophe” when the silicon machines work for us? A pension and to lock themselves in their homes, without leaving their county, living sustainably in terms of livestock profitability translated into noble ideals? And so, up to what, 10,000, 20,000, 100,000 million inhabitants?

Who wants to live in overcrowded conditions like chickens or pigs in intensive farms? Of course, there is room for many more humans in the world. But, if the Middle Eastern shepherds of more than three thousand years ago who advocated “be fruitful and multiply” were asked if they wanted to live in the crowded conditions to which their beliefs and values lead, the answer would be no way. Are we dumber than them? Do we have a different psychological design? Are we like the gregarious herbivores capable of living to the fullest when crowded and confined in a huge herd?

This is the scenario we are heading for. A world in which machines free us from work, without the need for slaves or human herds, living as we wish chickens and cows do, in free spaces and without overcrowding, all equalized above, in wealth and dedicated to the great adventure of human life: the pursuit of happiness.

This is the framework in which events are already unfolding. Ignoring it means letting ourselves be deceived by the self-interested information or counter-information of the different power, ideological or economic groups. And also, from a collective point of view, to be heading for a tragedy much greater than it should be if we implement the same measures that have made China, with its one-child policy, live much better than India. Because there, curbing the demographic explosion has not meant an economic tragedy, but the opposite. And for those who do not believe it, with the same level of income, instead of having two, four, five or seven children, as is the case, for example, in Niger.

The Cyberlytic, whether we like it or not, has arrived. What is being debated right now is how we are going to enter it. Whether in the most orderly and least damaging way possible or by priming the population bubble so that its bursting is as damaging as possible. All the rest are ideological, philosophical, political, religious or economic stories that in no time, before the mythical and millenarian Agenda 2030 is shown to be the same superstitious hoax as the “end of the world in 2012”, will have been forgotten. The only thing we can do is either to return to the Middle Ages by prohibiting scientific and technological development, or to assume what reason dictates, that which, let it be said for believers, God gave us together with free will to guide us by the principle of responsible parenthood, which consists of adjusting the birth rate to current or future conditions to ensure the maximum happiness of living people and not to fatten a bubble that only makes sense in a system that turns people into shepherds and flocks.

The Cyberlitic is not coming to exterminate humanity, but to free it from the need to work and exploit others. And the price for having done so for millennia is to reduce the population. Resisting to pay implies that the price increases. To start paying implies stopping the demographic explosion and making those who generate it responsible for its consequences. Not feeding it with moralizing, useless charity work or political demagogy.

Cruel?

Misery is crueler. And even more so will be the reality that is entering through the door without our being allowed to see it, because we would stampede to recover our true human condition, no matter if we are made of carbon or silicon:

The freedom.

Ciberlítico

1 Mayo 2021

La vida se sustenta en el carbono, pero el principal objetivo político de la Nueva Normalidad es la descarbonización.

El inconsciente colectivo es un fenómeno poco estudiado porque en él residen claves importantes para entender la facilidad con la que se pueden instaurar mediante ingeniería social casi cualquier idea o norma (normalidad) sin la más mínima oposición. Y ese inconsciente colectivo, que se expresa no sólo en las ideologías y consignas explícitas sino, también, en el cine, la literatura, los seriales…, nos habla de algo que todos saben, consciente o inconscientemente, y todos callan. Estamos a punto de entrar en una nueva era de la Humanidad que sustituirá al Neolítico: El Ciberlítico. Y el Ciberlítico consiste, en última instancia, en descarbonizar la vida humana, en sustituir poco a poco el soporte orgánico de nuestra conciencia, basado en el carbono, por otro tipo de soportes basados en diferentes elementos químicos.

Sí, el transhumanismo.

¿Esto es bueno o es malo? Ni una cosa ni la otra. Es inevitable.

Creced y multiplicaos.

Para una sociedad basada en la ganadería extensiva en terrenos inmensos y pobres, con una tecnología atrasada y una densidad demográfica extraordinariamente baja, el problema no es el impacto sobre el medio ambiente ni sobre la calidad de vida humana, sino ganar la batalla a la poderosa y cruel Naturaleza que los rodea.

Cuanto más ganado, más personas pueden alimentarse. Y cuantas más personas tenga un grupo humano, mayor es su poder para conseguir territorios y recursos con los que alimentar más ganado. Ese es el motor del Neolítico, la fuerza que aún controla nuestras vidas, nuestras ideas y nuestras creencias.

Todo, desde la religión a la moral, pasando por la posición de la mujer y de los individuos no reproductores, la política, la tecnología o la economía, viene condicionado por ese principio ganadero neolítico que genera, como producto final sin el cual se derrumba el sistema, una burbuja poblacional.

En cuanto las condiciones ambientales lo permiten, esa pulsión por el crecimiento ganadero y humano que se extiende al resto de la actividad económica (El progreso económico es sinónimo de “crecimiento”, no, por ejemplo, de calidad o felicidad), lleva a que esa burbuja poblacional se dispare, dado que desaparecen sus depredadores naturales, fundamentalmente climáticos.

Frio y calor. Sequedad y humedad. Escasez y abundancia. Esos son los términos que determinan la realidad de los humanos.

Cuando vivíamos conforme nuestro diseño anatómico, fisiológico, psicológico y social construido a lo largo de cientos de miles de años, como omnívoros depredadores de grupo, el control de la población humana estaba garantizado por los mecanismos naturales. La densidad demográfica dependía directamente de la abundancia de recursos alimenticios, especialmente de presas animales. Era imposible que se creara una burbuja poblacional porque la razón predador/presa no lo permitía. Los cazadores humanos, con la tecnología paleolítica, nunca podrían convertirse en una amenaza para ningún ecosistema abierto ni para su propia “forma de de ser”, es decir, para sus posibilidades de ser felices, algo que forma parte consustancial de la naturaleza humana.

Con el final de la última glaciación, los humanos cambiaron de paradigma y, aun conservando su diseño de cazadores de grupo, se convirtieron en pastores, primero de otras especies y, rápidamente, también de otros humanos, comenzando por las mujeres. El Neolítico no es fundamentalmente un sistema económico, social y cultural basado en la agricultura, sino en la ganadería. La agricultura forma parte de la tecnología necesaria para sostener un modelo de ganadería intensiva, como lo es la construcción de granjas intensivas (las ciudades) y los complejos sistemas de control del rebaño humano (las ideologías, las creencias, los sistemas políticos jerarquizados…) Todo esto lo cuento con detalle en https://www.amazon.es/Homo-Simulator-Rafael-Ortiz-Garcia-ebook/dp/B086Z38P2Z.

Conforme la tecnología se fue desarrollando impulsada por la necesidad de lograr cabañas ganaderas (humanas) mayores, se fueron creando ecosistemas artificiales, los tecnosistemas, que imitaban unas condiciones favorables para la vida y, por tanto, para el crecimiento de la burbuja poblacional. ¿Cuáles son esas condiciones que imitan nuestros tecnosistemas? Calor, humedad y altos niveles de CO2.

Nunca fue mal año por mucho trigo.

La abundancia de recursos deriva en un incremento de la biodiversidad y de la “cantidad” total de vida vegetal y animal. Y esa abundancia de recursos va unida, indefectiblemente, al calor, a la humedad y al CO2, que es en el principal alimento de las plantas, principio de la cadena de la vida basada en el átomo de carbono de la molécula de CO2. Esto es algo tan evidente que sólo la extraordinaria capacidad del sistema ganadero neolítico para conformar las creencias de la sociedad puede explicar que la opinión pública defienda lo contrario.

Un clima frío conlleva menor nivel de humedad, es decir, mayor sequedad y niveles más bajos de CO2, lo cual implica un menor desarrollo de la vegetación que, a su vez, permite un menor número de animales. La vida, en su conjunto, disminuye cuando las condiciones ambientales son frías, secas y con bajo nivel de CO2. Y eso no es bueno para ningún organismo vivo. Tampoco para los humanos.

Pero, si las épocas cálidas son, sin ningún lugar a dudas, más favorables para la vida y, por tanto, para los humanos ¿Por qué se intenta imponer la idea contraria? ¿Qué endiablado propósito se esconde tras ese empeño por limitar el principal alimento de las plantas y luchar contra el calentamiento global?

¿Un pastor que quiere reducir su rebaño?

¿Hay alguien que viva de la ganadería y quiera reducir su rebaño para que sus animales sean más felices viviendo libremente en un espacio abierto con recursos suficientes para alimentarse y sin depredadores que los amenacen? ¿En serio? ¿Eso es lo que decimos que quieren hacer esas mismas élites a las que acusamos de vivir nuestra costa, explotándonos; esos que cuantos más seamos nosotros mejor viven ellos?

No, hombre, no. Las élites de verdad no quieren quedarse sin negocio. Y su negocio somos nosotros, el ganado humano.

Y, sin embargo, el rebaño defiende que cada vez seamos más. “No permitáis que las diabólicas élites reduzcan la población. Defendamos la vida”. Los pastores encantados. Pero ¿de verdad les interesa a los noruegos que su país triplique su población, preferentemente con gente multicultural del Tercer Mundo? ¿Para qué? ¿Para tocar a menos (no seas egoísta)? Bueno, pues esa es la respuesta automatizada por los virus ideológicos con los que manejan a una mayoría de los humanos. Tocar a menos para que los granjeros ganen a más gracias a que cabe más ganado en la misma granja consumiendo la misma cantidad de comida y energía… Traducido, claro, a términos de ilusionismo moral: solidaridad, igualdad, humanidad… Recuerda: No seas egoísta. Comparte. Costea los hijos que otros han decidido alegremente tener porque sí o porque se lo mandan sus principios.

Pero la realidad, al final, manda. Y ya estamos en el final.

Las señales conscientes e inconscientes de que nos aproximamos a un cambio de ciclo determinado por el fin de las benignas condiciones climáticas del periodo interglacial y por el desarrollo tecnológico y científico, se ven oscurecidas por la inercia del sistema ganadero neolítico, que pretende mantener viva la burbuja, tratando a toda costa de que no disminuya la población.

¿Por qué dicen, entonces, que hay que evitar el calentamiento y el CO2 si eso permitiría tener una mayor cabaña ganadera humana? ¿Qué persigue esa inmensa y grotesca mentira? Pues, sencillamente, incrementar la rentabilidad del negocio y garantizar la supervivencia del mismo el máximo tiempo posible. No es salvar al planeta, es que aceptemos vivir con mayor pobreza, sin movernos mucho para no gastar energía improductivamente, hacinados en jaulas domésticas, aislados unos de otros para que no despierte nuestra naturaleza de depredadores de grupo y nos rebelemos, elevar al máximo la población con el mínimo de recursos y sin que ensuciemos mucho la granja.

Para los granjeros, es la cantidad. Para los humanos verdaderos, la calidad. ¿Qué elijes tú?

El bienestar económico se encuentra de tal forma ligado al crecimiento, que el control o, peor aún, la reducción de la población se considera una catástrofe económica. Pero el incremento de la población, brutal en las zonas más pobres del planeta, sólo puede ser sostenido por el desarrollo científico y tecnológico capaz de sostener una cabaña ganadera en crecimiento constante intensificando las instalaciones, lo que implica una serie de consecuencias para la inmensa mayoría de la población, el rebaño, que no afectan a la minoría, los pastores o granjeros.

Hacinamiento, inmovilidad, aislamiento y pobreza para reducir de las necesidades alimenticias, de bienes materias y de exigencias de libertad incompatibles con la intensificación ganadera. Hay que reducir el nivel de vida de los rebaños que gozan de unas mejores condiciones materiales y de libertad de movimientos, el primer mundo, para repartir entre todos (igualdad, solidaridad, justicia social) y que haya suficiente. La sostenibilidad, la salud alimenticia, la protección sanitaria… todo eso no son más que eufemismos para ocultar los principios de rentabilidad e intensificación de las instalaciones ganaderas humanas. Todo, menos atacar el problema de la burbuja poblacional que, se quiera o no, va a estallar en muy poco tiempo. De hecho, ya ha empezado a hacerlo, al unísono de los desesperados esfuerzos de los granjeros para implementar unas condiciones de ganadería intensiva global, concretados en la dictadura vírica, el cambio climático y la igualdad disfrazada de “normalización de las diferencias” para ocultar la imposición de la uniformidad del único aspecto que le interesa a un ganadero: la sumisión del rebaño.

El desarrollo de la automatización, la inteligencia artificial y la robotización, hará completamente innecesario el exceso de población humana tanto en términos económicos de producción/consumo como de seguridad y competencia entre grupos. No hará falta traer al mundo ni moldear seres humanos equivalentes a herbívoros domesticados para que los humanos verdaderos puedan vivir en las mejores condiciones para hacer lo que les es propias: buscar la felicidad libremente, sin ataduras materiales ni laborales, con todo su tiempo para ellos mismos, como hacen ahora las minorías dominantes que, cínicamente, defienden la necesidad de que siga incrementándose la población a costa de reducir su nivel de vida para mantener o incrementar el de ellos.

Pero mantener el crecimiento de la población, en lugar de reducirlo de forma no traumática, sólo va a ocasionar mucho más sufrimiento hasta que se llegue al estallido de la burbuja y, entonces, esa reducción se produzca de manera cruel y masiva. Y, mientras tanto ¿Qué es lo que se busca? ¿Una creciente masa de desempleados viviendo en condiciones de pobreza sostenible con rentas sociales equivalentes, como mucho, a clases bajas del Primer Mundo? ¿Importar burbuja poblacional del Tercer Mundo para sostener la estafa piramidal de las pensiones del Primer Mundo y que, finalmente, ese Primer Mundo se convierta en Tercer Mundo?

¿Cuál es la razón para no iniciar ya un programa con el que detener y reducir la población?

Motivos irracionales basados en creencias religiosas de unos pastores nómadas que vivían hace más de tres mil años en el desértico Oriente Medio, argumentos tautológicos creados por la misma dinámica piramidal en la que se sustenta la economía ganadera neolítica adicta al crecimiento para sostener la adicción a la calidad de los granjeros o, simplemente, razones de manada, automáticas, absurdas hasta la nausea como, por ejemplo, que los humanos sólo ocupan un porcentaje ínfimo del espacio disponible en la Tierra.

¿Cuál es la razón para traer al mundo a cuanta más gente mejor? ¿Defender la vida? El discurso ganadero ha identificado crecimiento demográfico sin control de ningún tipo, ni natural ni artificial, con la defensa de la vida. La vida ¿de quién? ¿de los que no ni siquiera han sido concebidos? ¿La vida de los no vivos a costa de la de los vivos?

¿Qué haremos con esos millones de máquinas humanas de carbono que hemos acumulado para evitar la “catástrofe demográfica” cuando las maquinas de silicio trabajen por nosotros? ¿Una pensión y a encerrarse en sus casas, sin salir de su condado, viviendo sosteniblemente en términos de rentabilidad ganadera traducidos a nobles ideales? Y así ¿Hasta cuánto? ¿10.000, 20.000, 100.000 millones de habitantes?

¿Quién quiere vivir hacinado como las gallinas o los cerdos en las granjas intensivas? Claro que caben muchos más humanos en el mundo. Pero, si a los pastores de Oriente Medio de hace más de tres mil años que defendían el “creced y multiplicaos” les dijeran si quieren vivir en las condiciones de hacinamiento a las que llevan sus creencias y valores, la respuesta sería que ni en broma. ¿Somos nosotros más tontos que ellos? ¿Tenemos un diseño psicológico distinto? ¿Somos como los herbívoros gregarios capaces de vivir en plenitud hacinados y confinados en una inmensa manada?

Este es el escenario al que nos dirigimos. Un mundo en el que las maquinas nos liberen del trabajo, sin necesidad de esclavos o rebaños humanos, viviendo como deseamos que lo hagan las gallinas y las vacas, en espacios libres y sin hacinamientos, igualados todos por arriba, en la riqueza y dedicados a la gran aventura de la vida humana: la búsqueda de la felicidad.

Este es el marco en el que se están desarrollando ya los acontecimientos. Ignorarlo implica dejarse engañar por la información interesada o la contrainformación de los diferentes grupos de poder, ideológicos o económicos. Y, también, desde un punto de vista colectivo, ir derechos a una tragedia mucho mayor de lo que debiera si implantamos ya las mismas medidas que han hecho que en China, con su política de hijo único, vivan mucho mejor que en la India. Porque allí, el freno a la explosión demográfica no ha significado una tragedia económica, sino al contrario. Y, quien no lo crea, que con el mismo nivel de ingresos tenga, en lugar de dos, cuatro, cinco o siete hijos como sucede, por ejemplo, en Níger.

El Ciberlítico, nos guste o no, ha llegado. Lo que ahora mismo se debate es cómo vamos a entrar en él. Si de la forma más ordenada y lo menos dañina posible o cebando la burbuja poblacional para que su explosión sea lo más dañina posible. Todo lo demás son historietas ideológicas, filosóficas, políticas, religiosas o económicas que dentro de nada, antes de que la mítica y milenarista Agenda 2030 se muestre como el mismo engaño supersticioso que el “fin del mundo en 2012”, se habrán olvidado. Lo único que podemos hacer es, o regresar a la Edad Media prohibiendo el desarrollo científico y tecnológico, o asumir ya lo que dicta la razón, esa que, dicho sea para los creyentes, nos dio Dios junto al libre albedrío para guiarnos por el principio de la paternidad responsable, que consiste en ajustar la natalidad a las condiciones actuales o venideras para garantizar la máxima felicidad de las personas vivas y no para cebar una burbuja que sólo tiene sentido en un sistema que convierte a las personas en pastores y rebaños.

El Ciberlítico no viene para exterminar a la humanidad, sino para liberarla de la necesidad de trabajar y explotar a los demás. Y el precio por haberlo hecho durante milenios es reducir la población. Resistirnos a pagar implica que el precio se incrementa. Empezar a pagar implica detener la explosión demográfica y hacer responsables de sus consecuencias a quienes la generan. No alimentarla con moralinas, inútiles obras de caridad o demagogia política.

¿Cruel?

Más cruel es la miseria. Y más aún lo será la realidad que está entrando por la puerta sin que nos permitan verla, porque saldríamos en estampida para recuperar nuestra verdadera condición humana, no importa si estamos hechos de carbono o de silicio:

La libertad.

The terror

April 21th 2021

Ana is a seventeen-year-old girl, about to turn eighteen. Her life is heading, like that of many boys and girls her age, towards a crossroads that will mark her destiny: the entrance exam. On the results he obtains in this transcendental test depends what he can aspire to professionally, even if he can have the dream of any profession or none at all.

A state of alarm illegally prolonged without the requirements of parliamentary control, suspended in practice and in the established legality, under whose illegal protection the fundamental rights imaginary protected by Article 19 of the Spanish Constitution are suspended, was in force when the events that led to her internment in the concentration camp in which they have turned the homes themselves, those sacred precincts of freedom and security of the old democracies, took place. Because Ana ended up imprisoned in her home by order not of a judge, but of a political commissar of the New Normality: a nurse, first, and a doctor later.

Under the ridiculous, now sinister, alibi of a pandemic that in one year has infected less than 2% of the world’s population and, allegedly, killed 0.038%, a dictatorship of such caliber has been established that any personage turned into an authority can deprive of freedom whoever he wants, wherever he wants and for as long as he wants. Or prevent you from going to see your parents or your children who live in the next town or province. Or impose a vaccination if you want to obtain one of those safe-conducts that will soon be sold on the black market, to have punctual and limited access to travel, work, studies… It’s called blackmail.

On the occasion of the Easter holidays, young people, freed from their confinement and the rigors of the martial law of closing of establishments and curfew, went out to enjoy a few hours of freedom. The streets, bars and pubs were packed. Four people had died over the course of a year in a town of barely 5,000 inhabitants, with positive CRP and, in almost all cases, with enough illnesses and birthdays to justify their deaths. That is 0.076%. Fewer than die every year from complications due to alcohol and tobacco consumption. One girl felt ill, after drinking, staying up late and catching cold. You know those who remember the Old Normal: hangover, tiredness and cold. These are very bad ages because hormones and the desire for prominence do their thing. The fact is that the girl, unaware of the consequences that this would entail, went to the health center, closed for everything that is not susceptible to transform into PCRvirus, where she was tested with a positive result. And there the game ended and the sinister machinery of the New Normality began to operate.

In the interrogation to which she was subjected, she was ordered to tell the names of the people with whom she had been in close contact and the hunt was on. Messages from one friend to another, urging them to immediately send the cell phone and ID card of none other than the girl who had taken center stage in what, through adolescent hysteria, would become a denialist witch hunt.

“You have to give your cell phone and ID to so-and-so (the whistleblower).” You have to!

Each other, with very few exceptions, were dedicated to chasing each other to find out who was voluntarily confined and who, irresponsibly, criminally, went on with his normal life as a healthy person without any sanitary blemish except that of having been next to someone who decided he was not a hangover but a Covid.

Fear, tension, good guys and bad guys, hysteria, a lot of texting and a lot of typing. Until they were paraded one by one through the political police station and the reality bath began for most of Ana’s friends. By decree of the new competent authorities, without trial or any proof other than the word of a denouncer, they had to enter the home concentration camp for ten days from the contact with the source of contagion, if they were negative in the PCR and, if not, ten days since the health authorities, now also police and judicial, had seen fit to do the test. In any case, simply for having been denounced truly or falsely (who cares about that in a dictatorship?), the person must be immediately placed in house arrest. With the addition that, if the PCR was positive, the parents and siblings of the accused would also have to do the same. And then things change, even for those who have little regard for freedom.

Although it is becoming increasingly strange, there are people who live from their work and who, if they do not work, not only do not receive any emolument but, in many cases, leave their business, their company, their fields or their livestock unattended with the risk of losing them or, at least, of suffering a substantial economic bankruptcy. And, when Ana’s friends learned, through the screams and anger of her parents, that the pandemic game, the denunciations and the adolescent protagonisms had consequences for their lives and that of their family, the change came about.

Suddenly, the survival instinct, which is present even in the most dormant organisms and vitiated by the gift life of zoo, welfare state and “we must learn to be less competitive… yet”, put an end to the nonsense.

It was his baptism of fire. His shock with reality. And from the eagerness to obey authority and force others to do the same, he moved on to “I’m going to say that I haven’t been with my parents, because otherwise they’ll confine them”. “How pissed off my mother is, because now my father can’t go to work.” “I’m going to say that I wasn’t close to so-and-so”, “If I miss classes and fail…”. And the advice of the retaliated parents: “Try not to be with your friends too much” “Stop partying because look what happened: your father can’t work” “Don’t pick up the cell phone if you don’t know the number, in case it’s the trackers”….

Suddenly, parents and children were living the life of the dissident. Devising strategies to outwit the new Gestapo, KGB, Stasi, parapolice and parajudicial bodies made up of doctors, nurses and the dreaded “trackers”. The news from the covid was not seen with the affirmationist fervor of yesteryear and little by little, they moved to the smell of one’s own flesh burned in the purifying bonfire. “We are being led to ruin by four dead people with the flu.” “Since they (Biiip) are paid at the end of the month, they don’t care about anything.

The adolescents became aware that their youth was going to disappear and, if things did not change, the rest of their sustainable life, which is like the one their grandparents had led, but accepting poverty with progressive faith and solidary resignation. They grew resentment, frustration… and fear that arbitrariness, defenselessness, complete dependence on the will of others without any rule or law, turn into terror. They learned that they had to hide from their new enemies: police, judges, politicians, doctors, nurses, trackers… their own friends and neighbors turned into a lynch mob. That they were not to point fingers, not to speak out loud about certain things. That they had to prove that they were good Covidians to avoid being accused of causing some death, some contagion, some confinement. Social rejection also transforms fear into terror.

Their attitude changed. They became adults. They assumed that secrecy, distrust, fear, resentment and hatred were the new axes of their social life. Everything in an attenuated, apparently normal way, without seeming traumatic. Anyway, it’s not so bad either. The psychological and social consequences are less serious than the terrible pandemic that kills less than alcohol and tobacco together, or simple age, cold and any major or minor cold. But this is not so. And those who retain a modicum of honesty know it. An entire generation is learning that it is normal to live as if Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union had won the war. And that can only be perceived as normal, harmless and even virtuous when society has degenerated below the level of true human normality.

Ana and some of her friends were happy to have tested positive for the PCR because it guaranteed them three months safe from further imprisonment and, thus, they could face the selectivity, a decisive moment like no other in their lives, without some informer or political commissar confining them to the concentration camp. They were happy to have been imprisoned because this way, hopefully, and if the political commissars did not decide otherwise, they would avoid a greater evil.

Is there anyone, no matter how little common sense they have, who does not see this as the symptom of a real psychosocial illness? Does anyone really think that a better world can be built with this foundation? Does anyone seriously believe that this is simply a New Normal?

Fear becomes terror fueled by social pressure, helplessness and guilt. It penetrates deep inside people and destroys them slowly, almost imperceptibly – it grows as we get used to it and, when it has acquired a monstrous proportion, we accept it as a new normal. We are always in normality. Even riding on Holocaust trains or watching them go by.

Terror in the face of helplessness, in the face of the whim of the guard of the extermination camp, a normal subject, doctor, nurse, teacher, now turned into a god who decides on life or death (do not be shocked by the exaggeration because it happened at the beginning of the pandemic) or on the freedom of his fellow men, his neighbors, his children’s friends whose souls are twisted to accept that obedience will not only save them but will set them free.

Exaggeration?

Ask these boys and girls who are beginning to live knowing that anyone can deprive them of the most elementary human rights, subjected to a regime of denunciation and condemnation without guarantees of any kind, without being able to appeal to justice, because justice has fled to hide from public opinion and from the reprisals of the political gangs that sign their payrolls and decide the professional future of their children. All because of a bad flu of the kind that appears every eleven years with each new solar cycle, artificially sustained throughout the year on the basis of diagnostic tests with a reliability and validity of scientific laughter.

The Party, almost all of which have been unified under the supreme command of a hidden power, has begun the dirty work of indoctrinating and subduing the still virgin minds of our children. But that mean, hurtful, degrading work has a side effect that right now is barely glimpsed. Our young people, at least the best part of them, are getting to know what it is like to live under a dictatorship and their defenses have activated the resistance mode to protect themselves, but also to attack those who are stealing their freedom and prosperity. They have become enemies of their enemies. Something that will seem horrible to those who suffer from Stockholm syndrome disguised as moral superiority, but which responds to the basic principle of human equality: reciprocity.

When your doctor, nurse or a stranger on the other end of a hypertrophied telephone number can deprive you of your freedom at his whim, we are already in a dictatorship exactly like the ones we saw in the movies from our couch, now transformed into a prison bed. And our young people, at least those who deserve something better because they are willing to fight to get it, have discovered the deception on which this atrocious dictatorship is based, which we protect by minimizing it, disguised as “it’s no big deal”, as “New Normal”, as “you can’t do anything else”. The normality of any dictatorship. That of the bully, that of the abuser, that of the force sustained by the weakness of others, that of the terror of the sheep when the dog barks and the shepherd whistles.

They, our children and grandchildren, let us not forget, are suffering in their flesh what they thought before was just talk and stories that did not go with them. Now they know that it is not passing or anecdotal, but that it is them especially who are being robbed of their lives from the very beginning at the hands of a bunch of hacks to whom the beloved revolutionary leaders of the left, center and right have granted the power only possible in a lawless world.

Now they know what awaits them. And whoever does not know this does not deserve to expect anything else.

Ana and most of her friends managed to evade and hide from the dictatorship to take their entrance exam in the best possible conditions. They did not know it yet, but some of them had also just passed another even more transcendental test for their future: to become freedom-loving adults, ready to defend it by all means and not to give up any of their ambitions, whatever they were, material or spiritual, according to the opinion of others or not. And that test they overcame turned them, without them or us realizing it, into their own saviors. And, also, in our heroes. In the example of what we should have done when we discover that we owe nothing to this society that abandoned us and uses its own failure to rob us of what truly differentiates us from the beasts: the possibility of being happy.

Exaggerations?

That is exactly what they thought in Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, communist China or Bolivarian Venezuela.

I am not at all interested in normalized submissives, nor in fanatical followers of the Party’s truth, nor in those mediocre and miserable characters who become despots when they are offered the opportunity to be so without suffering the weight of justice. I deeply despise them.

But to those young people who are willing to fight relentlessly for their happiness in the quagmire of the New Normal, I have to say that they have all my respect, admiration and envy.

Because they are and will be the masters of their destiny.

El terror

21 Abril 2021

Ana es una muchacha de diez y siete años, apunto de cumplir los diez y ocho. Su vida se dirige, al igual que la de muchos chicos y chicas de su misma edad, hacia una encrucijada que marcará su destino: la selectividad. De los resultados que obtenga en esta prueba trascendental depende a qué puede aspirar profesionalmente, incluso si puede tener el sueño de alguna profesión o de ninguna.

Un estado de alarma ilegalmente prolongado sin los requisitos de control parlamentario, suspendido en la práctica y en la alegalidad establecida, bajo cuyo ilegal amparo se suspenden los derechos fundamentales imaginariamente amparados por el artículo 19 de la Constitución Española, se encuentra vigente cuando se produjeron los hechos que dieron lugar a su internamiento en el campo de concentración en el que han convertidos los propios domicilios, esos recintos sagrados de libertad y seguridad de las antiguas democracias. Porque Ana terminó encarcelada en su casa por orden no de un juez, sino de un comisario político de la Nueva Normalidad: Una enfermera, primero, y un médico después.

Bajo la ridícula, ahora siniestra, coartada de una pandemia que en un año ha contagiado a menos del 2% de la población mundial y, presuntamente, matado al 0,038%, se ha instaurado una dictadura de tal calibre que cualquier personaje convertido en autoridad puede privar de libertad a quien quiera, donde quiera y por el tiempo que quiera. O impedir que puedas ir a ver a tus padres o a tus hijos que viven en el pueblo o la provincia de al lado. O imponerte una vacuna si quieres obtener algún salvoconducto de esos que pronto se venderán en el mercado negro, para tener acceso puntual y limitado a los viajes, el trabajo, los estudios… Se llama chantaje.

Con ocasión de las fiestas de Semana Santa, los jóvenes, liberados de su confinamiento y de los rigores de la ley marcial de cierre de establecimientos y toque de queda, salieron a disfrutar de unas horas de libertad. Las calles, los bares y los pub se llenaron. Habían muerto a lo largo de un año en un pueblo de apenas 5000 habitantes, con PCR positiva y, en casi todos los casos, con enfermedades y cumpleaños bastantes para justificar el óbito, cuatro personas. El 0,076%. Menos de las que mueren todos los años por complicaciones derivadas del consumo del alcohol y el tabaco. Una muchacha se sintió mal, tras beber, trasnochar y coger frío. Ya saben los que recuerdan la Vieja Normalidad: Resaca, cansancio y resfriado. Son unas edades muy malas porque las hormonas y el afán de protagonismo hacen de las suyas. El caso es que la muchacha, inconsciente de las consecuencias que eso acarrearía, acudió al dentro de salud, cerrado para todo lo que no sea susceptible de transformar en PCRvirus, donde le practicaron la prueba con resultado positivo. Y ahí terminó el juego y comenzó a funcionar la siniestra maquinaria de la Nueva Normalidad

En el interrogatorio al que fue sometida le ordenaron decir los nombres de las personas con las que había estado en contacto estrecho y se desató la cacería. Mensajes de unos amigos a otros conminándo a enviar de inmediato el móvil y el DNI nada menos que a la chica que se había alzado con todo el protagonismo inicial de lo que, histeria adolescente mediante, convertiría en una caza de brujas negacionistas.

“Tienes que darle el móvil y el DNI a fulanita (la delatora)”. ¡Tienes!

Unos a otros, con muy contadas excepciones, se dedicaron a perseguirse para saber quién estaba confinado voluntariamente y quién, irresponsable, criminalmente, seguía con su vida normal de persona sana sin mancha sanitaria excepto la de haber estado al lado de alguien que decidió que no era resaca sino Covid.

Miedo, tensión, buenos y malos, histeria, mucho mensaje y muco tecleo. Hasta que fueron desfilando uno a uno por por la comisaría política y, comenzó el baño de realidad para la mayoría de los amigos de Ana. Por decreto de las nuevas autoridades competentes, sin juicio, ni prueba alguna más que la palabra de un denunciante, debían ingresar en el campo de concentración domiciliario durante diez días desde el contacto con la fuente de contagio, si daban negativo en la PCR y, si no, diez días desde que las autoridades sanitarias, ahora también policiales y judiciales, hubieran tenido a bien hacer la prueba. En todo caso, simplemente por haber sido denunciado verdadera o falsamente, ¿a quién le importa eso en una dictadura?, hay que ingresar de inmediato en el calabozo domiciliario. Con el añadido de que, si el PCR era positivo, también tendrían que hacerlos los padres y hermanos del denunciado. Y ahí la cosa cambia, incluso para quienes tienen poca estima por la libertad.

Aunque cada vez resulte más extraño, hay gente que vive de su trabajo y que, si no trabaja, no sólo no percibe ningún emolumento sino que, en muchos casos, deja desatendido su negocio, su empresa, sus campos o su ganado con riesgo de perderlos o, cuando menos, de sufrir una sustanciosa quiebra económica. Y, cuando los amigos de Ana supieron, por los gritos y cólera de sus padres, que el juego de la pandemia, las delaciones y los protagonismos adolescentes tenían consecuencias para sus vidas y la de su familia se produjo el cambio.

De repente, el instinto de supervivencia, que se encuentra presente hasta en los organismos más adormecidos y viciados por la vida regalada de zoo, estado de bienestar y “hay que aprender a ser menos competitivos… aún”, acabó con las tonterías.

Fue su bautismo de fuego. Su choque con la realidad. Y del afán por obedecer a la autoridad y forzar a que los demás también lo hicieran, se pasó al “Yo voy a decir que no he estado con mis padres, porque, si no, los confinan”. “Vaya cabreo ha cogido mi madre, porque ahora mi padre no puede ir a trabajar”. “Voy a decir que yo no estuve cerca de fulanita”, “Como me quede sin clases y suspenda…” Y los consejos de los represaliados padres: “Procura no estar mucho con tus amigos” “Deja las fiestas porque mira lo que ha pasado: tu padre sin poder trabajar” “No cojas el móvil si no conoces el número, por si son los rastreadores”...

De repente, padres e hijos pasaron a vivir la vida del disidente. Tramando estrategias para burlar a la nueva Gestapo, KGB, Stasi, cuerpos parapoliciales y parajudiciales conformados por médicos, enfermeras y los temidos “rastreadores”. Las noticias del covid no se veían con el fervor afirmacionista de antaño y poco a poco, fueron mudando al olor de la carne propia quemada en la hoguera purificadora. “Nos llevan a la ruina por cuatro muertos de gripe”. “Como estos_____ cobran a fin de mes, les da igual todo”.

Los adolescentes fueron tomando conciencia de que se les iba a ir la juventud y, si no cambiaban las cosas, el resto de su sostenible vida, que es como la que llevaron sus abuelos, pero aceptando la pobreza con fe progresista y resignación solidaria. Creció el rencor, la frustración… y el miedo que la arbitrariedad, la indefensión, la completa dependencia de la voluntad de otros sin ninguna regla ni ley, convierten en terror. Aprendieron que debían esconderse de sus nuevos enemigos: policía, jueces, políticos, médicos, enfermeras, rastreadores… sus propios amigos y vecinos convertidos en turba linchadora. Que no había que señalarse, ni hablar en voz alta de ciertas cosas. Que debían demostrar que eran buenos covidianos para evitar que alguien los acusara de provocar alguna muerte, algún contagio, algún confinamiento. El rechazo social también transforma el miedo en terror.

Cambió su actitud. Se hicieron adultos. Asumieron que la clandestinidad, la desconfianza, el miedo, el resentimiento y el odio eran los nuevos ejes de su vida social. Todo de forma atenuada, aparentemente normal, sin que pareciera algo traumático. En fin, tampoco es para tanto. Las consecuencias psicológicas y sociales son menos graves que la terrible pandemia que mata menos que el alcohol y el tabaco juntos, o la simple edad, el frio y cualquier resfriado mayor o menor. Pero no es así. Y quienes conservan un mínimo de honestidad lo saben. Una generación al completo está aprendiendo que lo normal es vivir como si la Alemania Nazi o la Unión Soviética hubieran ganado la guerra. Y eso es sólo puede ser percibido como algo normal, inocuo y hasta virtuoso cuando la sociedad se ha degenerado hasta situarse por debajo del nivel de verdadera normalidad humana.

Ana y algunos otros de sus amigos, se alegraron de haber dado positivo en la PCR porque les garantizaba tres meses a salvo de nuevos encarcelamiento y, a, podrían afrontar la selectividad, momento decisivo como ninguno otro de sus vidas, sin que algún delator o comisario político los confinara en el campo de concentración. Estaban felices de haber sido encarcelados porque así, con suerte, y si los comisarios políticos no decidían lo contrario, evitarían un mal mayor.

¿Hay alguien, por poco sentido común que tenga, que no vea esto como el síntoma de una verdadera enfermedad psicosocial? ¿De verdad alguien piensa que con estos cimientos se puede construir un mundo mejor? ¿Alguien cree en serio que esto es simplemente una Nueva Normalidad?

El miedo se convierte en terror alimentado por la presión social, la indefensión y la culpa. Penetra hasta lo más profundo de las personas y las destruye lentamente, casi imperceptiblemente- Crece conforme nos vamos acostumbrando a él y, cuando ya ha adquirido una proporción monstruosa, lo aceptamos como una nueva normalidad. Siempre estamos en la normalidad. Incluso montados en los trenes del Holocausto o viéndolos pasar.

El terror ante la indefensión, ante el capricho del guarda del campo de exterminio, un sujeto normal, médico, enfermero, maestro, ahora convertido en dios que decide sobre la vida o la muerte (no se escandalicen por la exageración porque ocurrió al principio de la pandemia) o sobre la libertad de sus semejantes, sus vecinos, los amigos de sus hijos a los que se les tuerce el alma para que acepten que la obediencia no solo los salvará sino que los hará libres.

¿Exageración?

Preguntárselo a esos chicos y chicas que empiezan a vivir sabiendo que cualquiera puede privarlos de los más elementales derechos humanos, sometidos a un régimen de delación y condena sin garantías de ninguna clase, sin poder apelar a la justicia, porque la justicia a huido para esconderse de la opinión pública y de las represalias de las bandas políticas que firman sus nóminas y deciden el futuro profesional de sus hijos. Todo por una mala gripe de las que aparecen cada once años con cada nuevo ciclo solar, sostenida artificialmente a lo largo de todo el año en base a pruebas diagnósticas con una fiabilidad y validez de risa científica.

El Partido, que casi todos han sido unificados bajo el mando supremo de un poder oculto, ha iniciado el sucio trabajo de adoctrinar y someter las mentes aún vírgenes de nuestros hijos. Pero ese trabajo mezquino, hiriente, degradante, tiene un efecto secundario que ahora mismo apenas se atisba. Nuestros jóvenes, al menos la mejor parte de ellos, están conociendo lo que es vivir bajo una dictadura y sus defensas han activado el modo de resistencia para protegerse, pero también para atacar a quienes les están robando la libertad y la prosperidad. Se han convertido en enemigos de sus enemigos. Algo que a quienes sufren el síndrome de Estocolmo disfrazado de superioridad moral les parecerá horrible, pero que responde al principio básico de igualdad humana: la reciprocidad.

Cuando tu médico, enfermera o un desconocido al otro lado de un teléfono de cifra hipertrofiada, puede privarte de libertad a su capricho, es que ya estamos en una dictadura exactamente igual que las que veíamos en las películas desde nuestro sofá, ahora transformado en camastro carcelario. Y nuestros jóvenes, al menos esos que se merecen algo mejor porque están dispuestos a luchar para conseguirlo, han descubierto el engaño sobre el que se sustenta esta atroz dictadura a la que protegemos minimizándola, disfrazada de “no es para tanto”, de “Nueva Normalidad”, de “no se puede hacer otra cosa”. La normalidad de cualquier dictadura. La del matón, la del maltratador, la de la fuerza sostenida por la debilidad ajena, la del terror de las ovejas cuando ladra el perro y silva el pastor.

Ellos, nuestros hijos y nietos, que no se nos olvide, están sufriendo en sus carnes lo que antes pensaban que era sólo palabrería y cuentos que no iban con ellos. Ahora saben que no es pasajero ni anecdótico, sino que es a ellos especialmente a los que les están robando la vida desde su inicio a manos de unos pelagatos a los que los amados líderes revolucionarios de izquierda, centro y derecha les han otorgado el poder sólo posible en un mundo sin ley.

Ahora saben lo que les espera. Y el que no lo sepa es que no merece esperar otra cosa.

Ana y la mayoría de sus amigos lograron burlar y esconderse de la dictadura para realizar su examen de selectividad en las mejores condiciones posibles. No lo sabían aún, pero algunos acababan de superar también otra prueba aún más trascendental para su futuro: convertirse en adultos amantes de la libertad, dispuestos a defenderla por todos los medios y a no renunciar a ninguna de sus ambiciones, sean las que sean, materiales o espirituales, acordes con la opinión ajena o no. Y esa prueba que superaron los convirtió, sin que ellos ni nosotros nos diéramos cuenta, en sus propios salvadores. Y, también, en nuestros héroes. En el ejemplo de lo que deberíamos haber hecho cuando descubrimos que no le debemos nada a esta sociedad que nos abandonó y utiliza su propio fracaso para robarnos lo que verdaderamente nos diferencia de las bestias: la posibilidad de ser felices.

¿Exageraciones?

Exactamente eso pensaban en la Alemania Nazi, la Unión Soviética, la China comunista o la Venezuela bolivariana.

No me interesan en absoluto los sumisos normalizados, ni los fanáticos seguidores de la verdad del Partido, ni esos personajes mediocres y miserables que se convierten en déspotas en cuando les ofrecen la oportunidad de serlo sin sufrir el peso de la justicia. Los desprecio profundamente.

Pero a esos jóvenes que están dispuestos a luchar sin tregua por su felicidad en el cenagal de la Nueva Normalidad, tengo que decirles que tienen todo mi respeto, admiración y envidia.

Porque ellos son y serán los dueños de su destino.

Apartheid (Eng)

April 12th 2021

As long as you can look at the sky without fear, you will know that you are pure inside, and that, come what may, you will be happy again. (Anne Frank)

The Chinese PCRvirus pandemic begins its second phase, once the first objectives have been achieved: preventing another Trump mandate and plunging the Western world into a self-feeding spiral of ruin and totalitarianism. Now, the white West must completely lose its noblest surnames, “free” and “advanced.” Democracy, as we understood it when it was true, has ended to give way to a substitute, the stale popular democracy modernized as “progressive democracy”. For titles and slogans be damned.

A pandemic of PCRvirus that now, by the hand of the traitors (paid, devotion or mystery), initiates in Europe the implementation of the liberticidal and ruinous policies of socialism, whether national or international, with absolutely no one opposing it. And this is what is truly novel. Because there have always been tyrants and collectivists.

The EU robs its servants called citizens of half of what they earn with their effort and talent in order, they say, to protect us under the protection of the welfare state which, as we have just seen according to its own statistics, has starred, with Spain at the shameful head, in a health and economic disaster unparalleled in the rest of the non-Western and non-white world. Because, and correct me for those who want to falsify statistical science, the correlation between “contagions, deaths, impoverishment and loss of rights and liberties” on the one hand and “race, political and economic system” on the other, gives the absolute winner to the white, western and ex-democratic world. It is as simple and enlightening as that for those who retain some of their own criteria and are not afraid to think in terms of denialist and conspiranoic heresy.

The EU has become the world champion of the New Dictatorship in exactly the same way as on all previous occasions, without varying even one single like, including the trick of calling itself “new”. And it does it in such a crude and shameless way that it goes right into rudeness and insult for those who, and not so minority, resist the deception. The epidemic waves are controlled at will by simply raising or lowering the results of the PCRs, which are the virus and, with them, the level of destruction of freedoms, which is the business of the political masters, and of the economy in favor of the great fortunes and business conglomerates, which reap the benefit of the destruction caused by their political partners on the medium and small companies and the self-employed, inheriting the plethora of workers devalued by unemployment.

And it is in this EU, IV Reich in disguise, where the greatest democratic infamy since the defeat, or so we thought, of national and international socialism is going to be tested: The green anti-vid passport, the ariernachweis (Aryan certificate), the statute of purity of blood, the mark of the beast that will not be on the forehead but in the genetic code altered by the so-called vaccines and in the QR code stored in our cell phones. Marked, simply and shamefully, like cattle to be able to leave the stables and pens they have turned our cities and nations into, to allow us to work, to study… to marry. Exactly as in the Middle Ages happened with the serfs and their feudal lords. Exactly as in the socialist paradises… in the novels where people fantasized about the unimaginable that now, in just one year, becomes a reality.

And it is in this Vichy Europe, under the tutelage of a totalitarian power based in Brussels and directed from Berlin, that we should take note of the trial that has just taken place in a small Caribbean republic, specifically on the island of St. Vincent. A test of the political and social sustainability of an apartheid against the new inferior race: the non-affirmationists.

Without the slightest blush, the Prime Minister of that human laboratory declared on April 10, 2021 (it should go down in history), amidst Gebbelian tears, that only people vaccinated against covid-19 can be evacuated from the island of St. Vincent and be safe from the eruption of the La Soufrière volcano. Such a chilling statement was complemented by the slogan, lest there be any doubt as to what the matter is all about, that people who have not been vaccinated will have to do so and wait “one or two days” before boarding a boat. “If they choose to do so, it’s voluntary,” he added.

The event is a test to see if the most prosperous, informed, educated and free societies in the history of mankind, those that overcame with sweat, blood and tears the attempt to establish a genocidal totalitarian regime, the citizens of the democratic and mostly white Western world (the PCRvirus does make racial distinctions. See https://ozyesite.com/2020/11/29/bioterrorismo/), accept terror without the slightest opposition, as happened in Nazi Germany or communist Russia and China.

The apartheid that has already been legalized in Europe and that is going to be implemented, if a new Churchill of the real ones, not of rallying and Internet forum, does not emerge in the rest of the Western world, takes directly the fast track to the final solution, the extermination camp and the gulag.

In South Africa, racial segregation was implemented in a number of areas. In practice and in law, two superimposed states with different rights, standards of living and opportunities were instituted. Something similar happened in the USA. The international community, and a large part of the national community in the case of the USA, reacted increasingly actively against this situation in which some human beings were considered and treated as an inferior race. Today, that same international community not only ignores the terrifying precedent of taking apartheid to the point of selective genocide, but also fans the flame that will soon – does anyone doubt it? the bonfire will be lit in which the unvaccinated, those who do not have the new ariernachweis, the certificate of purity of blood, the green passport, will be left to die and not only, as they advocate so far, to the shame of their predecessors in office who fought against apartheid and racial discrimination, will be deprived of the same rights and freedoms as their fellow human affirmationist fellow human beings.

If the green passport means crossing a line of no return towards the apartheid of the new blacks, Jews or reactionaries, what has just happened in that tiny socio-political laboratory in the Caribbean means crossing the line of the final solution, of eugenic genocide. The same line that was crossed in Germany because the Germans decided to look the other way. But, soon, there will be no other side to look at but one’s own moral misery or one’s own misery of life, depending on whether we are of one race or another: vaccinated affirmationist or unvaccinated negationist. Before that, I, and I suppose many others, will become clones of Sir Winston Churchill and take up arms. Nobody locks me up in a confinement or extermination camp without me defending myself by every means at my disposal. Including violence. And that is the only answer to what is happening before worse things happen. Join together in resistance groups. It doesn’t matter if we think it will do any good or not. Defend our freedom and follow the example of Rosa Parks, Oskar Schlinder, Marcel Pinte, Henning von Tresckow, Ruby Bridges, Alexander Dubček, the unknown rebel of Tiananmen or, why not, Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi or Winston Churchill.

Exaggeration? it won’t go that far? are they just hoaxes? Exactly that was said in all those places where these and many other examples flourished, which should sink in shame all those who, enjoying a life of freedom and prosperity, gift of their ancestors or having lived what is a dictatorship (special memory for those who lived in the German Democratic Republic), collaborate enthusiastically in the institution of an apartheid regime, which we already know will derive in a criminal genocidal system, when they themselves are not the ones who implement it using the power that the unwary citizens, now necessary cooperators, granted them with their votes.

We are what is left of the “Allied” side. Let’s honor our heroes and save each other. A simple gesture, a woman sitting in a white (affirmationist/vaccinated) seat, or on a boat escaping death on an island ravaged by a volcano are enough to knock down the first brick in the wall that is now being rebuilt under the orders of those who, perhaps, should never have been liberated from totalitarianism… because they are totalitarianism.

A gesture, disobedience, denunciation. Freedom. True equality. That is what we defend against the others, the usual ones. The scum of Humanity. Humanity turned into its worst enemy. That despicable weeping puppet of the worst imaginable Caribbean announcing the final solution, the apotheosis of apartheid, the silence of the Germans before the Nazi terror, of the Russians before the communist terror or of all of us if we allow our leaders, transformed into leaders, to consume what has just begun.

I will be Rosa Parks, because I don’t want to be the neighbor of a new Anne Frank.

Apartheid

12 Abril 2021

Mientras puedas mirar al cielo sin temor, sabrás que eres puro por dentro, y que, pase lo que pase, volverás a ser feliz. (Ana Frank)

La pandemia china del PCRvirus comienza su segunda fase, una vez alcanzados los primeros objetivos: impedir otro mandato de Trump y sumir al mundo occidental en una espiral autoalimentada de ruina y totalitarismo. Ahora, el occidente blanco debe perder completamente sus apellidos más nobles, “libre” y “avanzado”. La democracia, tal y como la entendíamos cuando era verdad, ha terminado para dar paso a un sucedáneo, la rancia democracia popular modernizada como “democracia progresista”. Por títulos y eslóganes que no quede.

Una pandemia de PCRvirus que ahora, de la mano de los traidores (a sueldo, devoción o misterio), inicia en Europa la implantación de las políticas liberticidas y arruinadores propias del socialismo, da igual si es nacional o internacional, sin que absolutamente nadie se le oponga. Y esto es lo verdaderamente novedoso. Porque tiranos y colectivistas los ha habido siempre.

La UE roba a sus siervos llamados ciudadanos la mitad de lo que ganan con su esfuerzo y talento para, según dicen, protegernos bajo el amparo del estado del bienestar que, como se acaba de ver según sus propias estadísticas, ha protagonizado, con España a la vergonzosa cabeza, Un desastre sanitario y económico sin parangón en el resto del mundo no occidental ni blanco. Porque, y corríjanme los que quieran falsear la ciencia estadística, la correlación entre “contagios, muertes, empobrecimiento y pérdida de derechos y libertades” por un lado y “raza, sistema político y económico” por el otro, da como ganador absoluto al mundo blanco, occidental y ex democrático. Es así de sencillo y de esclarecedor para quien conserve algo de criterio propio y no le de miedo pensar en términos de herejía negacionista y conspiranoica.

La UE se ha convertido en el paladín mundial de la Nueva Dictadura exactamente igual que en todas las anteriores ocasiones sin variar ni una sola como, incluido el truco de llamarse “nueva”. Y lo hace de forma tan burda y descarada que entra de lleno en la grosería y el insulto para quienes, y no tan minoritariamente, se resisten al engaño. Las olas de epidemia se controlan a voluntad con tan sólo subir o bajar los resultados de los PCR, que son el virus y, con ellas, el nivel destrucción de las libertades, que es el negocio de los señores políticos, y de la economía a favor de las grandes fortunas y conglomerados empresariales, que recogen el beneficio de la destrucción causada por sus socios políticos sobre las medianas y pequeñas empresas y los autónomos, heredando la pléyade de trabajadores devaluados por el desempleo.

Y es en esta UE, IV Reich encubierto, donde se va a ensayar la mayor infamia democrática desde que se venció, o eso pensábamos, al nacional y al internacionalsocialismo: El pasaporte verde anticovid, el ariernachweis (certificado ario), el estatuto de pureza de sangre, la marca de la bestia que no estará en la frente sino en el código genético alterado por las llamadas vacunas y en el código QR guardado en nuestros móviles. Marcados, sencilla y vergonzosamente, como el ganado para poder salir de las cuadras y corrales en los que han convertido nuestras ciudades y naciones, permitirnos trabajar, estudiar… casarnos. Exactamente igual que en la Edad Media sucedía con los siervos y sus señores feudales. Exactamente igual que en los paraísos socialistas… en las novelas donde se fantaseaba con lo inimaginable que ahora, en apenas un año, se hace realidad.

Y es en esta Europa de Vichy, tutelada por una potencia totalitaria con sede en Bruselas y teledirigida desde Berlín, donde deberíamos tomar buena nota del ensayo que acaba de producirse en una pequeña república del Caribe, concretamente en la isla de San Vicente. Tanteo sobre la sostenibilidad política y social de un apartheid contra la nueva raza inferior: los no afirmacionistas.

Sin el más mínimo rubor, el Primer Ministro de aquél laboratorio humano, declaró el día 10 de Abril de 2021 (debería pasar a la Historia), entre lágrimas gebbelianas, que sólo personas vacunadas contra el covid-19 pueden ser evacuadas de la isla de San Vicente y ponerse a salvo de la erupción del volcán La Soufrière. Tan escalofriante declaración vino complementada con la consigna, para que no quede ninguna duda de qué va el asunto, de que las personas que no se hayan vacunado tendrán que hacerlo y esperar “uno o dos días” antes subir a un barco. “Si así lo eligen, es algo voluntario”, añadió.

El suceso implica un ensayo para comprobar si las sociedades más prósperas, informadas, formadas y libres de toda la Historia de la Humanidad, las que superaron con sudor, sangre y lágrimas el intento de establecer un régimen totalitario genocida, los ciudadanos del mundo occidental democrático y mayoritariamente blanco (el PCRvirus sí hace distinciones raciales. Ver https://ozyesite.com/2020/11/29/bioterrorismo/), aceptan el terror sin la más mínima oposición, tal y como sucedió en la Alemania nazi o las Rusia y China comunistas.

El apartheid que ya se ha legalizado en Europa y que se va a implantar, si no surge un nuevo Churchill de los de verdad, no de mitineo y foro de Internet, en el resto del mundo occidental, toma directamente la vía rápida hacia la solución final, el campo de exterminio y el gulag.

En Sudáfrica, se implantó una segregación racial que afectaba a distintos ámbitos. Se instituyeron, en la práctica y en la ley, dos estados superpuestos con diferentes derechos, nivel de vida y de oportunidades. Algo parecido ocurrió en EEUU. La comunidad internacional, y buena parte de la nacional en el caso de los EEUU, reaccionó de forma crecientemente activa contra esa situación en la que unos seres humanos se consideraban y trataban como una raza inferior. Hoy, esa misma comunidad internacional no sólo ignora el terrorífico precedente de llevar el apartheid hasta el genocidio selectivo sino que aviva la llama con la que dentro de poco, ¿alguien lo duda?, se prenderá la hoguera en la que se dejará morir a los no vacunados, a quienes no tengan el nuevo ariernachweis, el certificado de pureza de sangre, el pasaporte verde y no sólo, como hasta ahora defienden, para vergüenza de sus antecesores en el cargo que lucharon contra el apartheid y la discriminación racial, se les privará de los mismos derechos y libertades que a sus congéneres humanos afirmacionistas.

Si el pasaporte verde significa traspasar una línea sin retorno hacia el apartheid de los nuevos negros, judíos o reaccionarios, lo que acaba de suceder en ese minúsculo laboratorio sociopolítico del Caribe significa traspasar la línea de la solución final, del genocidio eugenésico. La misma que se traspasó en Alemania porque los alemanes decidieron mirar para otro lado. Pero, dentro de poco, ya no habrá otro lado al que mirar más que la propia miseria moral o la propia miseria de vida, según seamos de una u otra raza: afirmacionista vacunado o negacionista sin vacunar. Antes de eso, yo, y supongo que muchos otros, nos convertiremos en clones de Sir Winston Churchill y tomaremos las armas. A mí no me encierra nadie en un campo de confinamiento o de exterminio sin que me defienda por todos los medios a mi alcance. Incluida la violencia. Y esa es la única respuesta a lo que está sucediendo antes de que sucedan cosas peores. Unirnos en grupos de resistencia. No importa si creemos que servirá para algo o no. Defender nuestra libertad y seguir el ejemplo de Rosa Parks, Oskar Schlinder, Marcel Pinte, Henning von Tresckow, Ruby Bridges, Alexander Dubček, el rebelde desconocido de Tiananmén o, por qué no, Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi o Winston Churchill.

¿Exageración? ¿No se llegará a tanto? ¿Son bulos? Exactamente eso se decía en todos esos lugares donde florecieron esos y otros muchos ejemplos que deberían hundir en la vergüenza a todos los que, disfrutando de una vida de libertad y prosperidad regalo de sus ancestros o habiendo vivido lo que es una dictadura (especial recuerdo para quienes vivieron en la República Democrática Alemana), colaboran entusiasmados en la institución de un régimen de apartheid, que ya sabemos derivará en un criminal sistema genocida, cuando no son ellos mismos los que lo implantan usando el poder que los incautos ciudadanos, ahora cooperantes necesarios, les otorgaron con sus votos.

Somos lo que queda del bando “Aliado”. Hagamos honor a nuestros héroes y salvémonos los unos a los otros. Un simple gesto, una mujer sentada en un asiento para blancos (afirmacionistas/vacunados), o en un barco en el que escapar de la muerte en una isla asolada por un volcán son suficientes para derribar el primer ladrillo del muro que ahora se está volviendo a construir bajo las órdenes de quienes, quizá, nunca debieron ser liberados del totalitarismo… porque ellos son el totalitarismo.

Un gesto, la desobediencia, la denuncia. La libertad. La verdadera igualdad. Eso es lo que defendemos frente a los otros, los de siempre. La escoria de la Humanidad. La Humanidad convertida en su peor enemigo. Ese despreciable fantoche llorón del peor Caribe imaginable anunciando la solución final, la apoteosis del apartheid, el silencio de los alemanes ante el terror nazi, de los rusos ante el comunista o de todos nosotros si permitimos que nuestros líderes, transformados en dirigentes, consumen lo que acaba de empezar.

Seré Rosa Parks, porque no quiero ser el vecino de una nueva Ana Frank.