11/20/2025

In “Ancestral European” https://ozyesite.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ancestral-european-kindle.pdf, the history of our time, the Neolithic period, is recounted from a critical perspective. From this same perspective, it offers a view of those who have become the true conquerors of Europe and the Europeanized world: the Jews. This vision is far removed from the Jewish discourse about itself and, therefore, from the original pagan mythology, the subsequent conversion of that mythology into religion, and its final transformation into a philosophy of pragmatism recounted in Platonic terms. A view of what we could accurately and dispassionately call “the Jewish phenomenon” which, far from philias and phobias, exposes the efficient causes, the strengths and weaknesses of that phenomenon which, like everything else, transforms the world it dominates and is in turn transformed by that world in such a way that, to the desolation of the messianic myth, and both subject to the laws of symbiosis, the fulfillment of the final prophecy, which remains intact throughout the centuries, leads to mutual destruction.

This perspective, perhaps with some minor nuances, remains fully valid or, even more so, it is now that it shows itself in all its enlightening, demystifying, and, at the same time, apocalyptic splendor. Because, standing at the gates of Cyberlitic, just a few years away from humanity giving birth to a new version of itself superior to all that has gone before and is present today, Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), it is now that we can contemplate the end of all prophecies at the hands, paradoxically, of their fulfillment.

European Jews. “Ancestral European” (pages 120 to 128)

The Jews of the diaspora saw the predatory effect of exile reinforced by the fact that, having no territories of their own and no place in medieval society, they had no choice but to explore and occupy virtual ecosystems.

The prohibition on owning property or engaging in trades led them to seek a livelihood in the only thing that remained free because it was forbidden to Christians: usury. But, in addition, the financial business, closely linked to trade, wars, and catastrophes, had a favorable element: the Jewish diaspora itself. There was a Jew everywhere. They were, along with the Church, the common pan-European element.

Innovation, the absence of their own territory, and social exclusion led European Jews to explore and colonize a new continent: the future.

When the maximum limit that an ecosystem can support is exceeded, it is impossible to continue growing even if new Homo ceres are added to the livestock population. The same thing happens when access to physical resources is restricted or prevented. And in circumstances where it is no longer possible to create more virtual herbivores, there is only one solution: to create virtual territories. The future is a vast and virtually unexplored territory that allows the population bubble to grow without disrupting the predator-prey relationship or, more importantly, physically increasing the number of Homo ceres. All you have to do is capture and tame the humans of the present on that plain of the future by making them hand over their future alter ego as a hostage. That is what loans are all about: selling your future self.

The Christian rejection of lending was based on two doctrinal pillars: on the one hand, making money with money, without physical effort, is equivalent to theft and, on the other and more importantly, the lender sells time, which is God’s property. But the exploitation of the virtual continent “Future” is based precisely on the fact that time is not God’s property but man’s. And men have a decisive ally in colonizing the Future: the standard mind.

Homo ceres humans fall into the trap of the future, which consists of selling your future clone, because, thanks to their gregarious mind that lacks its own identity, they do not consider it something “their own” but rather one more of the anonymous components of the herd or flock. An ancestral European would never sell (betray) any of the members of their group, nor their future clone.

The trap of the future leads Homo ceres to believe that they can guarantee their present existence by using or sacrificing their future avatars. And so, with this mirage, they reduce their existential angst by feeling that they have some control over their destiny thanks to the link with their future avatars. However, the reality is that they are trapped in a state of even greater need and anguish when they discover that these avatars have been captured and enslaved by the Homo predator who dominate the steppes of the Future.

Through financial activity, Jews and Judaized Europeans established their dominance as shepherds of the flock of future humans, managing to compete with an advantage over the shepherds of the present thanks to two extraordinary instruments: the virtual economy and capitalism understood as the control of other people’s assets with hardly any restrictions or responsibility. Finally, this expansion of livestock territory thanks to the colonization of the future will be decisive in continuing to fuel the population bubble in the final phase of civilized Neolithic times in which we find ourselves, making Europeanized Jews and Judaized Europeans the ancestors of consumerism.

In the current model of economic growth, essentially Neolithic in that it requires constant population growth, financial consumerism is the ideal tool for exploiting this vast territory of the future in which humans find themselves defenseless as avatars of people in the present who, in turn, sink into an even more distressing and debilitating state of need. Because the exploitation of the future through financial consumerism gives the shepherds the added benefit of subjecting Homo ceres in the process of liberation or recovery from their predatory nexus to a completely unnecessary state of need, which manages to halt that process of liberation. In this way, the virtual population bubble created in the future destroys the incipient process of rehumanization that induces the slowdown in population growth. And that is why it is no coincidence that the large-scale exploitation of the territory of the future begins precisely at the same time as the decline of the European population and the recovery of the predatory nexus associated with it. Lenders began to build a specific technosystem, financial consumerism, exploiting present needs by enslaving the future avatars of borrowers, just when the recovery of the predatory nexus led many people to seek “hunting opportunities,” which demanded abundant and rapid resources in order to take advantage of those opportunities.

But this exploitation also resulted in strong animosity towards Jews, who were essentially identified as usurious moneylenders who lived off the use of money without any effort, that is, without producing any material wealth, profiting from the needs of others and selling time, which was divine property.

But there are other virtual territories besides the future. Europeanized Jews who managed to break free from their standardized minds set out to colonize a virtual territory that we could consider the very factory of virtualization: thought.

The Paleolithic mind is a part of the self that generates ideas, theories, and norms. Homo predator uses it to make decisions that allow it to adapt to each situation. Ideas, theories, procedures, and guidelines are not fixed and are only useful insofar as they serve to achieve our goals by adapting to the different situations we face. The Paleolithic mind thinks in terms of equivalence. It is inductive and, aided by experience, creates a personalized pattern of deduction for each situation. The Neolithic mind, however, thinks in terms of equality. It is deductive a priori, in the sense that it has a catalog of patterns of deduction with which it interprets the situation, seeking to adjust it to what its manual prescribes, identifying it with one of its stereotypes. The Paleolithic mind thinks in terms of “being.” The Neolithic mind thinks in terms of “being.”

There are no equalities or inequalities. There are equivalencies.

A bonfire is not the same as the Sun, nor is it different, but rather equivalent. Equivalence refers to the relationship established by the interest of a third party between two things. The bonfire is equivalent to the Sun insofar as it warms us. Equivalence is a relationship between things that does not establish fixed truths but rather statistics; it does not offer causal relationships but rather opportunities; it does not allow for religious, philosophical, or scientific certainties but rather technological utilities.

Equivalence expresses virtual nature insofar as it focuses on the capacity of simulation not to correspond to what is simulated in the sense of equality but to dominate what is simulated, the ecosystem, in order to create an effective technosystem in which we do not need to adapt to physical-chemical or biological reality.

The products of the Paleolithic mind form a statistical compendium through which we can save time when analyzing a situation and responding appropriately, that is, according to what interests us. But this compendium of probabilities and regularities is not a manual of laws governing events, because events govern themselves by the only law of no law: that of faits accomplis.

These products are transformed by the standardized Neolithic mind into principles that govern the functioning of things. They become variables that limit the possibility of what can happen and, therefore, seek to govern the world from that divine or theoretical beyond. However, for a technological or Paleolithic mind, events are a function of their own occurrence: what happens happens because (in fact) it happens. Not even the world of spirits, of the invisible, governs the things of the visible world, but rather both interact on the same plane of occurrence and equivalence.

Equivalences are replaced by a standardized body of thought that shapes the Neolithic mind, so that thought ceases to be a processor and becomes either a catalog (ideas, laws, truths…) of fixed content, as in the case of religious beliefs, or a fixed matrix for generating events, which is what Neolithized scientific theories consist of. A processor or a catalog/generator of possibilities. This is the fundamental difference between the two great currents of thought on which the European world of today is based. Ultimately, these are extensions of the struggle between individualism and collectivism, between the preservation of our predatory nature and our conversion into domesticated animals that, even when they retain a certain aggressiveness, behave like herbivores.

The poorly civilized European Jews, those who escape the ghetto and find themselves immersed in the Christian world without being effectively subjugated by a standardized mind, are nomads who roam freely across the plains of the future and of thought. And they do so with their Paleolithic and dissident minds, capable of observing things from unprecedented, transversal, situational perspectives, guided by the principle of equivalence even when they disguise their works with theological, philosophical, or scientific terms. They produce high technology in the sense of relating the world of the invisible and the visible, but instead of using magical or artistic formulas, they use words and concepts accepted by religious, philosophical, or scientific orthodoxy in order to protect themselves from the prevailing ideological system. They do not speak of God when they name him, nor of true, fixed, and objective laws, but of different aspects of a world in which the observer, that third party who establishes equivalence, is the ultimate criterion of what happens… because it is he who establishes the equivalence that supports the facts as a meaningful state of affairs and not as mere coincidences orbiting on the periphery of Truth.

There is a type of Paleolithic reason that great innovators, Europeanized Jews and Judaized Europeans, use to adapt and maintain their individuality, their reasoning self, as a criterion of knowledge. Meanwhile, there is another reason, that of many teachers and prophets, which stands as a criterion of the thinkable and a canon of truth or verification. A Neolithic, orthodox, dogmatic, and fixed way of thinking that is well expressed as a compendium of knowledge, laws, and rules or as a standardized matrix that generates universal knowledge, rules, and laws that apply everywhere and at all times, regardless of the state of affairs or the situation in which we find ourselves. In contrast to this is a Paleolithic way of thinking, the liberating heterodoxy of Spinoza, Freud, and Einstein, in which technology and business are mixed under the criterion of utility associated with Cro-Magnon magical realism.

A “Cro-Magnon” Judaism emerged in Europe, a product of the diaspora, of the virtual steppe before which Jews found themselves. This Judaism, together with the European dissent inhabiting its own internal diaspora, formed a new European identity. But another, orthodox Judaism also survived, entrenched behind the walls of dogma. This was the Judaism that clashed, ghetto against ghetto, with Christian orthodoxy.

If the Ashkenazim are not, as their name suggests, German, and the Sephardim are not Spanish, then who are? What is Israel if not a European state in the Asian diaspora? What is the Europeanized world if not a diaspora of Cro-Magnons in perpetual struggle against its own civilized mind?